Cited by 41Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

Geographic difference-in-discontinuities

Open access
Butts, Kyle·2023·Applied Economics Letters

Abstract

A recent econometric literature has critiqued the use of regression discontinuities where administrative borders serve as the ‘cutoff’. Identification in this context is difficult since multiple treatments can change at the cut-off and individuals can easily sort on either side of the border. This note extends the difference-in-discontinuities framework discussed in Grembi et al. (2016) to a geographic setting. This paper formalizes the identifying assumptions in this context, which will allow for the removal of time-invariant sorting and multiple treatments similar to the difference-in-differences methodology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13504851.2021.2005236

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Double-difference estimators are particularly powerful at controlling for previously existing differences in policies if those differences do not change over time.

    “Moreover, doubledifference estimators are particularly powerful to control for previously existing differences in policies if they do not change over time 89,93 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Cattaneo, Matias D., Nicolas Idrobo, and Rocio Titiunik. 2019. 'A Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs: Foundations.' arXiv:1911.09511 [econ, stat] . 10.1017/9781108684606, arXiv: 1911.09511. · DOI
  2. Galindo-Silva, Hector, Nibene Habib Some, and Guy Tchuente. 2021. 'Fuzzy Differencein-Discontinuities: Identification Theory and Application to the Affordable Care Act.' arXiv:1812.06537 [econ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06537 , arXiv: 1812.06537. · arXiv
  3. Grembi, Veronica, Tommaso Nannicini, and Ugo Troiano. 2016. 'Do Fiscal Rules Matter?' American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8 (3): 1-30. 10.1257/app. 20150076. · DOI
  4. Hahn, Jinyong, Petra Todd, and Wilbert Klaauw. 2001. 'Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity Design.' Econometrica 69 (1): 201-209. 10.1111/1468-0262.00183. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Keele, Luke J., and Rocío Titiunik. 2015. 'Geographic Boundaries as Regression Discontinuities.' Political Analysis 23 (1): 127-155. 10.1093/pan/mpu014. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Millán-Quijano, Jaime. 2020. 'Fuzzy difference in discontinuities.' Applied Economics Letters 27 (19): 1552-1555. 10.1080/13504851.2019.1696930. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Butts, K.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Butts, Kyle
Venue
Applied Economics Letters
Published
2021-11-23
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
615-619
ISSN
  • 1350-4851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4291
OpenAlex
W3200597923
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
regression discontinuity design, administrative boundaries, identification, multiple treatments, causal inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review