The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy
Open accessAbstract
Works on the quality of democracy propose standards for evaluating politics beyond those encompassed by a minimal definition of democracy. Yet, what is the quality of democracy? This article first reconstructs and assesses current conceptualizations of the quality of democracy. Thereafter, it reconceptualises the quality of democracy by equating it with democracy pure and simple, positing that democracy is a synthesis of political freedom and political equality, and spelling out the implications of this substantive assumption. The proposal is to broaden the concept of democracy to address two additional spheres: government decision-making — political institutions are democratic inasmuch as a majority of citizens can change the status quo — and the social environment of politics — the social context cannot turn the principles of political freedom and equality into mere formalities. Alternative specifications of democratic standards are considered and reasons for discarding them are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sen, A. (2009) · Rugman Reviews · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-28787-8_94 · Cited by 15,837
Clapp, J., & Sen, A. (1999) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40203469 · Cited by 13,411
Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition.
Ericson, J. E., & Dahl, R. A. (1972) · American Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2711442 · Cited by 7,203
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.
Robinson, J., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1943) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226398 · Cited by 6,529
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-2963 · Cited by 3,601
(1962) · Excellence and Leadership in a Democracy · doi:10.7312/grau91070-013 · Cited by 3,317
Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-4738 · Cited by 2,990
A Preface to Democratic Theory.
Gross, F., & Dahl, R. A. (1957) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088784 · Cited by 2,180
A Preface to Democratic Theory
Harbold, W. H., & Dahl, R. A. (1957) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/443559 · Cited by 1,939
Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research
Collier, D., & Adcock, R. (2001) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1,603
Cited by
Measuring high level democratic principles using the V-Dem data
Coppedge, M., Lindberg, S., Skaaning, S.-E., & Teorell, J. (2016) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512115622046 · Cited by 283
Towards a unified approach to research on democratic backsliding
Jee, H., Lueders, H., & Myrick, R. (2022) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.2010709 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Munck, G. L.
- Venue
- Democratization
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-06-27
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 1351-0347 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-890X
- OpenAlex
- W1983733932
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 76.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13510347.2014.918104
- The paper
- Munck, G. L. (2016). What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy. Democratization. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.918104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.