The DOI matches its Crossref record.
?Doing Archaeology?: cultural heritage management and its role in identifying the link between archaeological practice and theory
Abstract
Using a case study of the recent history of archaeology in Australia, the paper details how Cultural Heritage Management, in addition to protecting the archaeological data base, actually protects archaeological access to it. In offering this protection, archaeologists involved in Cultural Heritage Management become the regulators of archaeological practice and theory. Here archaeology comes into direct contact and conflict with governments and a range of interest groups, notably the Aboriginal community, with a stake in material culture. In effect 'doing' Cultural Heritage Management is 'doing' archaeology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The governance of the archaeological spatial database itself is a symbol of the authority of archaeology.
“In this sense, the governance of the archaeological spatial database itself is a symbol of the authority of archaeology (L.Smith 2000, 311).”
From What We See, What We Don’t See: Data Governance, Archaeological Spatial Databases and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in an Age of Big Data (2020) · cites this paper as L.Smith 2000
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gupta, N., Blair, S., & Nicholas, R. (2020) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00934690.2020.1713969 · Cited by 58
Teaching Archaeological Heritage Management. Towards a Change in Paradigms
Willems, A., Thomas, S., Castillo Mena, A., Čeginskas, V., Immonen, V., Kalakoski, I., Lähdesmäki, T., Lähdesmäki, U., Gowen-Larsen, M., Marciniak, A., et al. (2018) · Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites · doi:10.1080/13505033.2018.1559423 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Heritage Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 309-316
- ISSN
- 1352-7258
- 1470-3610
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
