CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Whose Sense of Place? Reconciling Archaeological Perspectives with Community Values: Cultural Landscapes in England

Waterton, Emma·2005·International Journal of Heritage Studies
DOI 10.1080/13527250500235591
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Like other forms of heritage, landscape provides a vital repository of cultural meaning in relation to identity, belonging and sense of place. Despite this, the process of heritage management tends to obscure these links between landscapes and communities, and is thus neglectful of the experiences, perspectives and recollections that both individuals and groups bring to their engagement with heritage. This paper draws on the Hareshaw Linn community project to illustrate the diverse ways in which communities construct relationships with landscape. This case study serves as a reminder that the heritage management process cannot usefully be reduced to the technical and scientific practice it is often assumed to be, as it is often both emotional and conflict ridden. In light of this, it is essential to question why landscape is underplayed in legislation and public policy, and this necessarily entails the exploration of issues such as ownership, power, knowledge and ‘public’ heritage.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13527250500235591

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Allen T., 1999, Managing the Historic Rural Landscape, 163
  2. Artelius S., 2001, Its About Time: The Concept of Time in Archaeology, 1
  3. Benton T., 2001, Philosophy of Social Science: The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought
  4. Casey E. S., 1996, Senses of Place, 13
  5. Chouliaraki L., 1999, Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis
  6. Christians C. G., 2003, The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues, 208
  7. Crouch D., 1990, Landscape Research, 15, 11, 10.1080/01426399008706301 · DOI
  8. Dark K. R., 1995, Theoretical Archaeology
  9. Emerick K., 2001, Destruction and Conservation of Cultural Property, 276
  10. Feld S., 1996, Senses of Place, 3
  11. Franklin A., 2002, Nature and Social Theory
  12. 10.2307/278113 · DOI
  13. Giddens A., 1990, The Consequences of Modernity
  14. 1991, Modernity and Self‐identity
  15. Glacken C., 1967, Traces on the Rhodian Shore: Nature and Culture in Western Thought from Ancient Times to the End of the 18th Century, 10.1525/9780520343054 · DOI
  16. Gosden C., 1992, Antiquity, 66, 803, 10.1017/S0003598X0003951X · DOI
  17. Graham B., 2000, A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture and Economy
  18. Green M., 2002, Hareshaw Linn Interpretive Project Report
  19. Gwyn D., 2002, Europe’s Cultural Landscapes: Archaeologists and the Management of Change, 187
  20. Hall S., 1994, Colonial Discourse and Post‐colonial Theory: A Reader, 392
  21. Heidegger M., 1977, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays
  22. Hides S., 1996, Cultural Identity and Archaeology: The Construction of European Communities, 25
  23. Howard P., 2001, Heritage and Identity: Shaping the Nations of the North, 239
  24. 10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Johnson M., 1999, Archaeological Theory: An Introduction
  26. Karlsson H., 2001, Its About Time: The Concept of Time in Archaeology, ix
  27. Kintz T., 2001, The Responsibilities of Archaeologists: Archaeology and Ethics, 47
  28. Kristiansen K., 1989, Archaeological Heritage Management in the Modern World, 23
  29. Lahn J., 1996, Issues in Management Archaeology, 25
  30. 10.1525/aa.1995.97.2.02a00050 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Mayne‐Wilson W., 2001, Landscape Australia, 23, 10
  32. McBryde I., 1995, Historic Environment, 11, 8
  33. 10.1080/13527259808722232 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/13527250410001677919 · DOI
  35. Nicholas G. P., 2001, Australian Archaeology, 52, 29, 10.1080/03122417.2001.11681703 · DOI
  36. 1999, News
  37. 2003, Management Plan, 3rd Review Framework Document: A Secure Future for the Land of the Far Horizons
  38. Olivier L. C., 2001, Its About Time: The Concept of Time in Archaeology, 61
  39. Osborne B. S., 1996, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2, 23, 10.1080/13527259608722159 · DOI
  40. Pearson M., 1995, Looking after Heritage Places: The Basics of Heritage Planning for Managers, Landowners and Administrators
  41. Preucel R. W., 1990, Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, 17
  42. Ross A., 1995, Issues in Management Archaeology, 9
  43. Russell J., 1997, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 3, 71, 10.1080/13527259708722191 · DOI
  44. Silberman N. A., 1995, Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology, 249
  45. 10.4324/9780203423325 · DOI
  46. Smith L., 1993, Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 12, 55
  47. 10.4324/9780203307991 · DOI
  48. 2004, Antiquity, 78, 404, 10.1017/S0003598X00113043 · DOI
  49. Smith L., 1998, Governing Australia: Studies in Contemporary Rationalities of Government, 173
  50. Stewart K. C., 1996, Senses of Place, 137
  51. Store J., 1992, Australia in Oceania, 27, 161
  52. Strang V., 2003, The Ethics of Anthropology: Debates and Dilemmas, 172
  53. Tehan M., 1996, University of Tasmania Law Review, 15, 267
  54. Tilley C., 1998, Reader in Archaeological Theory: Post‐processual and Cognitive Approaches, 305
  55. 1996, Interpreting the Northumberland National Parks Cultural Heritage: An Interpretive Plan for Hareshaw Linn
  56. Trigger B., 1989, A History of Archaeological Thought
  57. 10.1080/00293652.1991.9965534 · DOI
  58. Tunbridge J., 1996, Dissonant Heritage
  59. van Dommelen P., 1999, Archaeologies of Landscape, 277
  60. Wylie A., 2002, Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology, 10.1525/9780520935402 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1017/S0940739198770079 · DOI
  62. Lynott M. J., 2000, Ethics in American Archaeology, 71
  63. Bray T., 2001, The Future of the Past: Archaeologists, Native Americans and Repatriation, 169

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 109

Metadata

Authors
Waterton, E.
Venue
International Journal of Heritage Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-01
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
309-325
ISSN
  • 1352-7258
  • 1470-3610
DOI
10.1080/13527250500235591
Cited by
109
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review