CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Utility of Discourse Analysis to Heritage Studies: The Burra Charter and Social Inclusion

Waterton, Emma, Smith, Laurajane, Campbell, Gary·2006·International Journal of Heritage Studies
DOI 10.1080/13527250600727000
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper reviews the methodological utility of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) in heritage studies. Using the Burra Charter as a case study we argue that the way we talk, write and otherwise represent heritage both constitutes and is constituted by the operation of a dominant discourse. In identifying the discursive construction of heritage, the paper argues we may reveal competing and conflicting discourses and the power relations that underpin the power/knowledge relations between expertise and community interests. This identification presents an opportunity for the resolution of conflicts and ambiguities in the pursuit of equitable dialogues and social inclusion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13527250600727000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 1979, The Burra Charter
  2. 1999, The Burra Charter
  3. Barthel D., 1999, Historic Preservation: Collective Memory and Historical Identity
  4. Bauman Z., 1987, Legislators and Interpreters
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511610295 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Byrne D., 2003, Social Significance: A Discussion Paper
  7. Chilton P. A., 2002, Politics as Text: Analytical Approaches to Political Discourses, 10.1075/dapsac.4 · DOI
  8. Chouliaraki L., 1999, Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis
  9. Derry L., 2003, Archaeologists and Local Communities: Partners in Exploring the Past
  10. Domicelj J., 1992, The Illustrated Burra Charter: Making Good Decisions About the Care of Important Places
  11. Fairclough N., 1995, Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language
  12. ——, 2000, New Labour, New Language?
  13. ——, 2001, Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, 229
  14. ——, 2001, How to Analyse Text in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods, 25
  15. ——, 2003, Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research
  16. 10.1080/17405900410001674489 · DOI
  17. Fairclough N., 1997, Discourse as Social Interaction, 258
  18. Hajer M., 1996, The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, 43
  19. 10.1080/0159630970180302 · DOI
  20. Kuipers M. J., 2005, Senses of Place: Senses of Time, 205
  21. Lazar M., 2005, Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse, 10.1057/9780230599901 · DOI
  22. Lemke J. L., 1995, Discourse in Society: Systemic Functional Perspectives. Meaning and Choice in Language: Studies for Michael Halliday, 85
  23. Marston G., 2004, Social Policy and Discourse Analysis: Policy Change in Public Housing
  24. Martin J., 2003, Re/reading the Past: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Time and Value, 1, 10.1075/dapsac.8 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/17405900410001674498 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/13527259808722232 · DOI
  27. 10.4324/9780203307991 · DOI
  28. ——, 2006, The Uses of Heritage
  29. Taylor S., 2001, Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, 5
  30. Tonkiss F., 1998, Researching Society and Culture, 245
  31. Urry J., 1996, Theorizing Museums, 45
  32. van Dijk T. A., 1997, Discourse as Social Interaction
  33. van Leeuwen T., 1999, Challenges in a Changing World: Issues in Critical Discourse Analysis, 87
  34. Walker M., 2004, The Illustrated Burra Charter: Good Practice for Heritage Places
  35. 10.1080/140360900750044746 · DOI
  36. Wetherell M., 2001, Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader, 9
  37. Wetherell M., 2001, Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader
  38. Wodak R., 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 1, 10.4135/9780857028020 · DOI · Paper page
  39. ——, 2004, Qualitative Research Practice, 197
  40. ——, 2005, Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power, and Ideology in Discourse, 90

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Waterton, E., Smith, L., & Campbell, G.
Venue
International Journal of Heritage Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2006-07
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
339-355
ISSN
  • 1352-7258
  • 1470-3610
DOI
10.1080/13527250600727000
Cited by
213
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review