Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Taboo and sensitive heritage: labour camps, burials and the role of activism in the Channel Islands

Carr, Gilly, Sturdy Colls, Caroline·2016·International Journal of Heritage Studies

Abstract

In this article we propose the concept of taboo heritage as a way to describe a legacy of war so sensitive that it never undergoes heritage creation. Attempts at creation, such as heritage listing, renovation or excavation, are blocked by local authorities. We also examine the transition from taboo heritage to sensitive heritage, the next step along the ‘heritage continuum’, which we propose can only occur through the combined efforts of the passage of time, the role of activists and official authorisation. We take as our case study two of the British Channel Islands of Jersey and Alderney, occupied by German forces from 1940 to 1945. Labour camps were built in both islands, where the dead were also buried locally. We explore how the existing legacy of these events is still taboo heritage in Alderney, but has achieved partial progress in the transition to sensitive heritage in Jersey.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13527258.2016.1191524

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1007/978-3-319-03407-2 · DOI
  2. Carr G., 2015, Heritage and Memory of War: Responses from Small Islands, 75, 10.4324/9781315736433 · DOI
  3. Carr G., Journal of Conflict Archaeology
  4. Carr G., Holocaust Studies: A Journal of Culture and History
  5. Etkind A., 2010, East European Memory Studies, 1, 4
  6. Ginns M., 1994, The Organisation Todt and the Fortress Engineers in the Channel Islands
  7. 10.1080/135272500404197 · DOI
  8. Logan W., 2009, Places of Pain and Shame: Dealing with ‘Difficult Heritage’
  9. Macdonald S., 2005, The Politics of Heritage: The Legacies of Race, 49
  10. Macdonald S., 2009, Heritage and Identity: Engagement and Demission in the Contemporary World, 93
  11. Macdonald S., 2009, Difficult Heritage: Negotiating the Nazi Past in Nuremberg and Beyond
  12. Merrill S., 2010, A Reader in Dark Tourism and Uncomfortable Heritage, 153
  13. 10.1353/anq.2002.0050 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1163/157407705774929006 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Sanders P., 2005, The British Channel Islands under German Occupation 1940–1945
  16. 10.4324/9780203602263 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Stone P., 2006, Tourism, 54, 145
  18. Sturdy Colls C., 2012, Holocaust Archaeology: Archaeological Approaches to Landscapes of Nazi Genocide and Persecution
  19. 10.1179/1350503315Z.00000000092 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/978-3-319-10641-0 · DOI
  21. Sturdy Colls C., 2014, Visual Heritage in the Digital Age, 119
  22. Sturdy Colls C., Adolf Island (Working Title)
  23. Sturdy Colls C., Journal of Conflict Archaeology
  24. Tunbridge J. E., 1996, Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict
  25. 10.3989/chdj.2015.018 · DOI
  26. Willmot L., 2014, Protest, Defiance and Resistance in the Channel Islands: German Occupation 1940–1945, 97

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Carr, G., & Sturdy Colls, C.
Venue
International Journal of Heritage Studies
Published
2016-06-08
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
702-715
ISSN
  • 1352-7258
  • 1470-3610
Cited by
17
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • British Academy (SG142541)
  • McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
  • Staffordshire University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review