Cited by 81Digital Marketing and Social MediaAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

The roles of celebrity endorsers’ and consumers’ vegan identity in marketing communication about veganism

Phua, Joe, Jin, S. Venus, Kim, Jihoon (Jay)·2020·Journal of Marketing Communications

Abstract

Celebrities endorsing veganism may exert social influence on consumers’ attitude toward veganism and behavioral intention to become vegan. A between-subjects online experiment (N = 303) examined the effects of consumers’ eating habits (meat eater versus non-meat eater) and celebrities’ vegan identity (altruistic motivation versus egoistic motivation) on various outcomes of health communication about veganism. Results of statistical analyses revealed a significant multivariate main effect of consumers’ eating habits on health consciousness, intention to spread electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) about veganism, and behavioral intention to become vegan. The results also reveal interaction effects between vegan celebrity endorsers’ motivation and consumers’ eating habits on health consciousness, intention to spread eWoM about veganism, and behavioral intention to become vegan. Additionally, moderating effects of source credibility, subjective norms, and identification with the vegan celebrity endorser were found. This study sheds some light on celebrity endorsements of veganism and effects of message framing on consumers’ veganism-related attitude and behavioral intention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13527266.2019.1590854

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 81

Authors
Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • School of Business, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea
  • Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
Venue
Journal of Marketing Communications
Published
2019-03-25
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
813-835
ISSN
  • 1352-7266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4445
OpenAlex
W2947815906
Cited by
81
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7
FWCI
18.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing Communications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
veganism, celebrity endorsement, vegan identity, altruistic motivation, egoistic motivation, consumer eating habits, health communication, electronic word of mouth, behavioral intention, health consciousness, source credibility, subjective norms, message framing, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review