Cited by 108Religious Studies and Spiritual PracticesMisinformation and Its ImpactsMedia, Religion, Digital Communication

Conspirituality Reconsidered: How Surprising and How New is the Confluence of Spirituality and Conspiracy Theory?

Asprem, Egil, Dyrendal, Asbjørn·2015·Journal of Contemporary Religion

Abstract

Those who have followed the development of online new religiosity over the past decade will not have failed to notice that conspiracy theories and ‘New Age’ ideas are thriving together. But how new and how surprising is the phenomenon of ‘conspirituality’? In the present article, we challenge the thesis put forward by Charlotte Ward and David Voas in their article of 2011, published in the Journal of Contemporary Religion, that a confluence of spirituality and conspiracism has emerged in the past two decades as a form of New Age theodicy. Instead, we argue, on theoretical grounds, that conspirituality can be viewed as a predictable result of structural elements in the cultic milieu and, on historical grounds, that its roots stretch deep into the history of Western esotericism. Together, these two considerations allow us not only to suggest that conspirituality is old and predictable, but also to identify a large potential for further research which will contribute to the study of conspiracy culture and enable a new line of comparative research in religious studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13537903.2015.1081339

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This narrative structure is also usually present when contemporary esotericists articulate conspiracy theories.

    “this narrative structure is also usually present when contemporary esotericists articulate conspiracy theories”

    From New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism (2021) · cites this paper as Asprem and Dyrendal, 2015

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 108

Authors
Asprem, E., & Dyrendal, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Venue
Journal of Contemporary Religion
Published
2015-09-02
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
367-382
ISSN
  • 1353-7903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9419
OpenAlex
W1794389597
Cited by
108
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contemporary Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Media, Religion, Digital Communication
Keywords
conspirituality, conspiracy theories, spirituality, New Age, cultic milieu, Western esotericism, conspiracy culture, theodicy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review