Conspirituality Reconsidered: How Surprising and How New is the Confluence of Spirituality and Conspiracy Theory?
Abstract
Those who have followed the development of online new religiosity over the past decade will not have failed to notice that conspiracy theories and ‘New Age’ ideas are thriving together. But how new and how surprising is the phenomenon of ‘conspirituality’? In the present article, we challenge the thesis put forward by Charlotte Ward and David Voas in their article of 2011, published in the Journal of Contemporary Religion, that a confluence of spirituality and conspiracism has emerged in the past two decades as a form of New Age theodicy. Instead, we argue, on theoretical grounds, that conspirituality can be viewed as a predictable result of structural elements in the cultic milieu and, on historical grounds, that its roots stretch deep into the history of Western esotericism. Together, these two considerations allow us not only to suggest that conspirituality is old and predictable, but also to identify a large potential for further research which will contribute to the study of conspiracy culture and enable a new line of comparative research in religious studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This narrative structure is also usually present when contemporary esotericists articulate conspiracy theories.
“this narrative structure is also usually present when contemporary esotericists articulate conspiracy theories”
From New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism (2021) · cites this paper as Asprem and Dyrendal, 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 108
- Authors
- Asprem, E., & Dyrendal, A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- Venue
- Journal of Contemporary Religion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-09-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-382
- ISSN
- 1353-7903 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9419
- OpenAlex
- W1794389597
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Contemporary Religion (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Media, Religion, Digital Communication
- Keywords
- conspirituality, conspiracy theories, spirituality, New Age, cultic milieu, Western esotericism, conspiracy culture, theodicy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review