Cited by 19Religious Studies and Spiritual PracticesIndian and Buddhist StudiesStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

British Buddhism and the new age

Cush, Denise·1996·Journal of Contemporary Religion

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between Buddhism and the New Age movement in Britain. The main substance is a report of the varying attitudes towards the New Age movement discovered in literary sources, and (mainly) from interviews and correspondence undertaken during 1993/4. The article suggests that a pattern emerges from the developments of the last few decades; that the common ancestor in Theosophy is an important influence on the relationship; that some significant similarities and differences can be observed when generalising about Buddhism and the New Age movement; and that the interaction of the two may lead to interesting developments in the future.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13537909608580768

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Vishvapani, 1994, Buddhism and the New Age
  2. Anonymous, 1992, UKE, United Kingdom Express, 32
  3. Bailey A., 1991, The New Age: An Anthology, 22
  4. Bloom W., 1991, The New Age: An Anthology
  5. Crook J., 1994, New Ch'an Forum
  6. Cush D., 1990, Buddhists in Britain Today
  7. Cush D., 1994, Buddhism
  8. Humphreys C., 1968, 60 Years of Buddhism in England
  9. James A., 1987, Modern Buddhism
  10. Jones K., 1993, Beyond Optimism: A Buddhist Political Ecology
  11. Yeshe Losal Lama, 1993, Holy Island Project Newsletter, 19
  12. 10.1016/0048-721X(91)90029-P · DOI
  13. Nisker W., 1993, Inquiring Mind, 10, 43
  14. Oliver I., 1979, Buddhism in Britain
  15. Parry D., 1991, The New Age, An Anthology, 221
  16. Russel P., 1993, Holy Island Project Newsletter, 22
  17. Saunders N., 1975, Alternative England and Wales
  18. Snelling J., 1987, The Buddhist Handbook
  19. Stern D., 1993, Teaching World Religions, 152
  20. Subhuti, 1983, Buddhism for Today
  21. Conze E., 1959, Buddhist Scriptures
  22. Vishvapani D., 1994, The Western Buddhist Review, 1, 9
  23. 10.1080/13537909108580642 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/13537909408580716 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Cush, D.
Affiliations
Bath Spa University (GB)
Corresponding author
Cush, Denise
Venue
Journal of Contemporary Religion
Published
1996-05
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
195-208
ISSN
  • 1353-7903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9419
OpenAlex
W2056797884
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Contemporary Religion (publishedVersion)
  • Research Space (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
New Age, Theosophy, religious syncretism, spiritualism, new religious movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: British Buddhism and the new age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13537909608580768
The paper
Cush, D. (1996). British Buddhism and the new age. Journal of Contemporary Religion. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537909608580768