‘That's not treating you as a professional’: teachers constructing complex professional identities through talk
Abstract
Public debates about the role of teachers and teacher performance place teachers at the center of a range of national and local discourses. The notion of teacher professional identity, therefore, framed in a variety of ways, engages people across social contexts, whether as educators, parents, students, taxpayers, voters or consumers of news and popular media. These highly contested discourses about teachers' roles and responsibilities constitute an important context for research on teachers and teaching, as researchers and educators ask how changes to the teaching profession affect teacher professional identity. This article investigates the identity talk of three mid‐career teachers in an urban, public school in the USA, to better understand how the teachers used language to accomplish complex professional identities. Research approaches to teacher identity often focus on teacher narrative as a key tool in identity formation. The analysis presented here extends our understanding of language as a resource in teacher identity construction by using discourse analysis to investigate how speakers use implicit meaning to accomplish the role identity of teacher. The analytical lens draws on an interdisciplinary framework that combines a sociological approach to teacher as a role identity with an investigation of language as a cultural practice, grounded in the ethnography of communication. The analysis focuses on how teachers use specific discourse strategies – reported speech, mi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the systematic review, research focused on how different policy contexts and educational reform shaped teachers' identities, including tensions between professional beliefs, values and sense of purpose with policy goals.
“In the systematic review, research focused on the ways in which different policy contexts and educational reform shaped teachers' identities, including highlighting tensions between professional beliefs, values and sense of purpose with policy goals (Cohen, 2008;Day et al., 2005;McNally et al., 2008).”
From Understanding teacher identity in teachers' professional lives: A systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as Cohen, 2008
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 40 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Cohen, J. L.
- Affiliations
- DePaul University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cohen, Jennifer L.
- Venue
- Teachers and Teaching
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 79-93
- ISSN
- 1354-0602 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1278
- OpenAlex
- W2018303196
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 15.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers and Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- DePaul University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, sociology, and vocational training
- Keywords
- teacher identity, role identity, counter-discourse, reported speech, teacher as collaborator, teacher as knowledge producer, teacher as agent of change, mid-career teachers, public schools, teacher identity construction, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review