Professional identity of a reading teacher: responding to high‐stakes testing pressures
Abstract
This case study explores the professional identity of one reading specialist, Marsha, who struggled with testing pressures at her urban elementary school in the U.S. It offers an in‐depth look at how Marsha’s instructional decisions and practices in a pull‐out reading program aimed at helping English Language Learners (ELL) shifted when she was faced with tensions between her own professional beliefs and knowledge about effective reading instruction and district based pressures to help her students pass the ‘test.’ Unlike other studies, instead of viewing teachers as autonomous agents who make simplistic instructional decisions in response to testing pressures, this article illuminates the complexities and contextual tensions some reading teachers must navigate in an era of high stakes accountability. Ethnographic and grounded theory methodologies were used for this study. Findings suggest that Marsha struggled over her commitment to help her students pass the test and at the same time grappled with how to stay true to her own professional identity. This tension pushed Marsha to change her literacy practices gleaned from years of experience for a test focused literacy curriculum. Implications from this study suggest that testing pressures not only affect teachers’ instruction and responsiveness to students’ learning needs but can compromise a teacher’s professional identity and can influence teachers’ responsibility and ethical sense of what they should do for their students…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Articles in this review considered the wider context, which becomes embedded into school structures and cultures and has marked effects on developing teacher identities.
“Articles in this review also considered this wider context, which becomes embedded into the school structures and cultures, and which inevitably has marked effects on developing teacher identities (Assaf, 2008;Attard Tonna & Calleja, 2023;Leonard & Roberts, 2014).”
From Understanding teacher identity in teachers' professional lives: A systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as Assaf, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rushton, E. A. C., Rawlings Smith, E., Steadman, S., & Towers, E. (2023) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3417 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
- Authors
- Assaf, L. C.
- Affiliations
- Texas State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Assaf, Lori Czop
- ORCID
- Assaf, Lori Czop
- Venue
- Teachers and Teaching
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-05-22
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 239-252
- ISSN
- 1354-0602 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1278
- OpenAlex
- W2071441990
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 14.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers and Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Keywords
- teacher identity, high-stakes testing, reading teachers, English language learners, instructional decision-making, teacher autonomy, accountability, urban elementary schools, teacher ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review