Cited by 188Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Professional Development and MotivationOccupational Health and Burnout

Pedagogical well‐being: Reflecting learning and well‐being in teachers' work

Soini, Tiina, Pyhältö, Kirsi, Pietarinen, Janne·2010·Teachers and Teaching

Abstract

Teachers’ learning and occupational well‐being is crucial in attaining educational goals both in the classroom and at the school community level. In this article teachers’ occupational well‐being that is constructed in teaching–learning processes within the school community is referred to as pedagogical well‐being. The article focuses on exploring teachers’ experienced pedagogical well‐being by examining the kinds of situations that teachers themselves find either empowering and engaging or burdening and stressful in their work. The study aims to: (1) identify the primary contexts of teachers’ experienced critical incidents of pedagogical well‐being; and (2) determine the kind of action strategies teachers have adopted in these contexts when they are reported as empowering and engaging. The study included data collected from the teachers of nine case‐schools around Finland. Altogether, a selected group of 68 comprehensive school teachers, including both primary and secondary school teachers, were interviewed. Our results suggested that interaction with pupils in socially and pedagogically challenging situations constitutes the core of teachers’ pedagogical well‐being. Success in both the pedagogical goals and more general social goals seem to be fundamental preconditions for teachers’ experienced pedagogical well‐being. Further investigation showed that teachers’ approaches to socially challenging situations varied. Results suggest that teachers’ pedagogical well‐being is centrally generated in the challenging social interactions of their work. Moreover, the way in which a teacher acts in the situation is found to be a regulator for experienced pedagogical well‐being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13540602.2010.517690

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 188

Authors
Soini, T., Pyhältö, K., & Pietarinen, J.
Affiliations
  • Tampere University (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Soini, Tiina
Venue
Teachers and Teaching
Published
2010-10-11
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
735-751
ISSN
  • 1354-0602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1278
OpenAlex
W2054123690
Cited by
188
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
21.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teachers and Teaching (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Työsuojelurahasto
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
teacher learning, teacher-student relationship, teacher stress, comprehensive schools, Finland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review