Promoting thinking, problem‐solving and reasoning during small group discussions
Abstract
The study reports on the types of questioning strategies teachers use to promote thinking, problem‐solving and reasoning during small group discussions. The study also reports on the types of discourses students use to problem‐solve and reason during their small group discussions. An audiotape of one class lesson from the three teachers included in the study and a sample of a small group discussion from each classroom were collected and fully transcribed. The results show that the teachers used a variety of questioning strategies, ranging from those that challenged children’s perspectives to those higher‐level questions that required children to provide reasons, make connections and think metacognitively. In turn, the children appropriated many of these ways of thinking and talking and used them in their interactions with each other. The study shows that if teachers want to encourage children to engage in higher‐level thinking and talking then they need to explicitly guide and scaffold these discourse patterns in their interactions with their students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When applying support, students often mirror teachers' behavior or helping style.
“When applying support, students often mirror teachers' behavior or helping style (Gillies, 2011;Jadallah et al., 2011;Webb, Nemer, & Ing, 2006).”
From Scaffolding Student Understanding in Small-Group Work: Students’ Uptake of Teacher Support in Subsequent Small-Group Interaction (2019) · cites this paper as Gillies, 2011
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 41 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Gillies, R. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Gillies, Robyn M.
- ORCID
- Gillies, Robyn M.
- Venue
- Teachers and Teaching
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-01-13
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-89
- ISSN
- 1354-0602 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1278
- OpenAlex
- W2071208584
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers and Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- teacher questioning strategies, small group discussion, higher-order thinking skills, problem solving, reasoning, metacognition, classroom discourse, scaffolding, peer interaction, primary education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review