Defining and targeting wild-type BRCA high-grade serous ovarian cancer: DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoints
Abstract
Introduction: Molecular analyzes including molecular descriptor/phenotype interactions have led to better characterization of epithelial ovarian cancer patients, including a definition of a BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) phenotype. Understanding how and when to use agents targeted against dependent BRCAwt pathways or other molecular events at disease progression is an important translational and therapeutic direction in ovarian cancer research.Areas covered: In this overview, we provide definitions and descriptions of a BRCAwt genotype and phenotype. We discuss novel investigational drugs that hold promise for the treatment of BRCAwt ovarian cancer, including inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, ribonucleotide reductase, DNA protein kinase-catalytic subunit, ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated kinase (ATM), ataxia-telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related kinase (ATR), CHK 1/2, cyclin kinases, glutaminase-1, WEE1 kinase, as well as tumor microenvironment and angiogenesis inhibitors. This article explores the known and the emerging areas of clinical research on patients with BRCAwt ovarian cancer.Expert opinion: Discovery of molecular changes tied to annotated disease information, along with an expanding array of pathway targets and targeted therapeutic agents, creates optimism and opportunity for women with ovarian cancer. Using precision oncology approaches, clinical researchers are, and will be, poised to select more effective treatments for ovarian cancer patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite various approaches, no definitive results have been reached yet to guide precision treatment for women with BRCAwt ovarian cancers.
“Despite various approaches have been developed, including mutational signature, transcriptomic signatures, tumor mutational burden, and functional biomarkers, no definitive results have been reached yet to guide precision treatment for women with BRCAwt ovarian cancers [8, 9].”
From Identification of a novel gene signature predicting response to first-line chemotherapy in BRCA wild-type high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
Hovelson, D. H., McDaniel, A. S., Cani, A. K., Johnson, B., Rhodes, K., Williams, P. D., Bandla, S., Bien, G., Choppa, P., Hyland, F., et al. (2015) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1016/j.neo.2015.03.004 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Cediranib suppresses homology-directed DNA repair through down-regulation of BRCA1/2 and RAD51
Kaplan, A. R., Gueble, S. E., Liu, Y., Oeck, S., Kim, H., Yun, Z., & Glazer, P. M. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aav4508 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buttarelli, M., Ciucci, A., Palluzzi, F., Raspaglio, G., Marchetti, C., Perrone, E., Minucci, A., Giacò, L., Fagotti, A., Scambia, G., et al. (2022) · Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13046-022-02265-w · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Despite various approaches have been developed, including mutational signature, transcriptomic signatures, tumor mutational burden, and functional biomarkers, no definitive results have been reached yet to guide precision treatment for women with BRCAwt ovarian cancers [8, 9].”
Background
- Authors
- Ivy, S. P., Kunos, C. A., Arnaldez, F. I., & Kohn, E. C.
- Affiliations
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ivy, S. Percy
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-08-30
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 771-785
- ISSN
- 1354-3784 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7658
- OpenAlex
- W2970206133
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Keywords
- high-grade serous ovarian cancer, DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints, PARP inhibitors, ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors, ATM inhibitors, ATR inhibitors, CHK1/2 inhibitor, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, Wee1 kinase inhibitor, angiogenesis inhibitors, precision oncology, targeted therapy
- MeSH terms
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, DNA Repair, Female, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Drugs, Investigational, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Cell Cycle Checkpoints, Neoplasm Grading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review