Investigational IRAK-4 inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory auto-immune disease that can lead to permanent disability and deformity. Despite current treatment modalities, many patients are still unable to reach remission. Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK-4) inhibitors are novel agents designed to suppress immune signaling pathways involved in inflammation and joint destruction in RA. Four IRAK-4 inhibitors have entered clinical trials. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the current stage of development of IRAK-4 inhibitors in clinical trials, detailing their chemistry, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic potential in the treatment of RA. PubMed, Embase and restricted Google searches were conducted using the term 'IRAK-4', and publicly accessible clinical trial databases were reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: IRAK-4 inhibitors are an exciting therapeutic option in RA management because unlike other targeted disease-modifying agents, they target the innate immune system. The role of IRAK-4 as a key component of Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor signaling and its potential for a low rate of infectious complications is particularly exciting and this may facilitate their use in combination treatment. A key aspect of upcoming clinical trials will be the identification of biomarkers predictive of treatment efficacy, which will help to define if and how they will be used in the clinic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The role of IRAK4 in inflammatory conditions, as well as in B cell lymphomas, is well established, and several inhibitors are currently in clinical trials in autoimmune indications.
“but the role of IRAK4 in inflammatory conditions, as well as in B cell lymphomas, is well established, and several inhibitors are currently in clinical trials in autoimmune indications165,171.”
From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [171]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Wiese, M. D., Manning-Bennett, A. T., & Abuhelwa, A. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Corresponding author
- Wiese, Michael D.
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-04-17
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 475-482
- ISSN
- 1354-3784 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7658
- OpenAlex
- W3014980743
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Natural Compounds in Disease Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
- Keywords
- rheumatoid arthritis, IRAK4, Toll-like receptor signaling, innate immunity, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, biomarkers, infectious complications, combination therapy
- MeSH terms
- Drug Development, Animals, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Inflammation, Signal Transduction, Antirheumatic Agents, Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review