The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Exploring the perceptual characteristics of voice-hallucinations in deaf people
Abstract
Introduction Previous research has not taken account of the possibility that deaf people will show greater heterogeneity in how they experience voice-hallucinations due to individual differences in experience with language and residual hearing. This study aims to explore how deaf participants perceive voice-hallucinations and whether the perceptual characteristics reported reflect individual experience with language and sensory input. Method A statement-sorting task generated data about perceptual characteristics of voice-hallucinations for exploratory factor analysis. The sample included 27 deaf participants with experience of voice-hallucinations, and a range of hearing loss and language backgrounds. Results Perceptual characteristics of voice-hallucinations map closely onto individual auditory experience. People born profoundly deaf loaded onto nonauditory factors. Deaf people with experience of hearing speech, through residual hearing, hearing aids, or predeafness experience, reported auditory features or uncertainty about mode of perception. Conclusions This is the first study to systematically explore voice-hallucinations in deaf people and to advance a model of subvocal articulation to account for such counterintuitive phenomena.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One is that the amount of data available on deaf individuals with hallucinations is still very meagre: Atkinson et al. (2007), for example, reported on a total sample of 27 individuals, and included some subgroups containing only two people.”
From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Atkinson et al. (2007)
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 37
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1093/schbul/sbj063 · DOI
- Baddeley A. D., 1984, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 233, 10.1080/14640748408402157 · DOI · Paper page
- Bates E., 2002, Child neurology, 69
- Brown S. R., 1980, Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science
- 10.1192/bjp.138.1.30 · DOI
- 10.1192/bjp.182.4.347 · DOI
- Cutting J., 1985, The psychology of schizophrenia
- 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1999.tb05988.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00001756-199603220-00021 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1999.tb00992.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00054-7 · DOI
- Evans J. W., 1981, Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 787, 10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780320067007 · DOI
- 10.1192/bjp.153.4.437 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00791.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01471-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00180-4 · DOI
- Mayberry R., 1993, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1258, 10.1044/jshr.3606.1258 · DOI
- McDonald J., 1978, Perception and Psychophysics, 91, 169
- 10.1097/00001756-199702100-00023 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15516709cog1401_2 · DOI · Paper page
- Stainton-Rogers R., 1995, Rethinking methods in psychology, 178, 10.4135/9781446221792.n12 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0920-9964(00)00150-X · DOI
- Stephane M., 2000, Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 12, 286, 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12.2.286 · DOI
- Stephenson W., 1978, Communication, 3, 21
- 10.3758/BF03196138 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Atkinson, J. R., Gleeson, K., Cromwell, J., & O'Rourke, S.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Atkinson, Joanna R.
- Venue
- Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 339-361
- ISSN
- 1354-6805 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0619
- OpenAlex
- W2153356046
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-620-28-6001)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- deafness, auditory perception, residual hearing, hearing aids, language experience, auditory hallucinations, individual differences, hearing loss
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Deafness, Female, United Kingdom, Hallucinations, Humans, Individuality, Male, Middle Aged, Sign Language, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
