The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health-related stigma: Rethinking concepts and interventions 1
Abstract
As a feature of many chronic health problems, stigma contributes to a hidden burden of illness. Health-related stigma is typically characterized by social disqualification of individuals and populations who are identified with particular health problems. Another aspect is characterized by social disqualification targeting other features of a person's identity-such as ethnicity, sexual preferences or socio-economic status-which through limited access to services and other social disadvantages result in adverse effects on health. Health professionals therefore have substantial interests in recognizing and mitigating the impact of stigma as both a feature and a cause of many health problems. Rendering historical concepts of stigma as a discrediting physical attribute obsolete, two generations of Goffman-inspired sociological studies have redefined stigma as a socially discrediting situation of individuals. Based on that formulation and to specify health research interests, a working definition of health-related stigma is proposed. It emphasizes the particular features of target health problems and the role of particular social, cultural and economic settings in developing countries. As a practical matter, it relates to various strategies for intervention, which may focus on controlling or treating target health problems with informed health and social policies, countering the disposition of perpetrators to stigmatize, and supporting those who are stigmatized to limit their vulnerability and strengthen their resilience. Our suggestions for health studies of stigma highlight needs for disease- and culture-specific research that serves the interests of international health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Psychology of Stigma
Major, B., & O'Brien, L. T. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137 · Cited by 3,114
Stigma and disease: changing paradigms
Scambler, G. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)08068-4 · Cited by 341
Cited by
Livingston, J. D., & Boyd, J. E. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.030 · Cited by 1,677
Livingston, J. D., Milne, T., Fang, M. L., & Amari, E. (2012) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03601.x · Cited by 927
Scambler, G. (2009) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01161.x · Cited by 658
Global burden of hepatitis B virus: current status, missed opportunities and a call for action
Hsu, Y.-C., Huang, D. Q., & Nguyen, M. H. (2023) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-023-00760-9 · Cited by 632
Kohrt, B. A., & Hruschka, D. J. (2010) · Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s11013-010-9170-2 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiss, M. G., Ramakrishna, J., & Somma, D.
- Venue
- Psychology, Health & Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 277-287
- ISSN
- 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3966
- OpenAlex
- W2138798441
- Cited by
- 828
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health-related stigma: Rethinking concepts and interventions 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13548500600595053
- The paper
- Weiss, M. G., Ramakrishna, J., & Somma, D. (2006). Health-related stigma: Rethinking concepts and interventions 1. Psychology, Health & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500600595053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.