Talking to primary care patients about weight: A study of GPs and practice nurses in the UK
Abstract
Evidence-based guidance recommends that primary care health practitioners should deliver brief interventions to their patients to change behaviours to reduce overweight and obesity. This cross-sectional study investigates UK general practitioners' (GPs) and practice nurses' communication about overweight with their overweight and obese patients. Forty general practitioners and 47 practice nurses in two inner-London primary care organizations completed a questionnaire about past practice and concerns. When there was no identified medical problem, 38% of GPs and 14% of practice nurses reported raising the issue on less than 50% of occasions. Practice nurses were more likely than GPs to raise the issue of weight, both when there was no medical problem and when there was a medical problem. When they did raise the issue of overweight, only 9% did so in the context of presenting possible solutions to weight loss or in discussions about health promotion. Fifty two per cent of GPs and 28% of practice nurses had concerns about raising the issue of overweight; the most common being that patients would react emotionally to the message. These results suggest that there is considerable room for improvement in the frequency with which primary care practitioners address the questions of weight in their overweight patients, especially amongst doctors. Training to increase skills and confidence in communicating about weight is recommended.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Insufficient time, lack of knowledge, training or confidence and inadequate materials are major barriers to health professionals giving weight loss advice.
“with insufficient time, lack of knowledge, training or confidence and inadequate materials reported to be major barriers.12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18”
From A brief intervention for weight control based on habit-formation theory delivered through primary care: results from a randomised controlled trial (2017) · cites this paper as [18]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 11 · Cited by 110
- Authors
- Michie, S.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Michie, Susan
- ORCID
- Michie, Susan
- Venue
- Psychology, Health & Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 521-525
- ISSN
- 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3966
- OpenAlex
- W2010010855
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology Health & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- overweight, obesity, brief intervention, general practitioners, practice nurses, primary care, health professional-patient communication, weight loss advice, health promotion, communication skills training
- MeSH terms
- Communication, London, Nurses, Obesity, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians, Family, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review