Cited by 133Physical Activity and HealthMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Internet-delivered behavioral intervention to increase physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis: Sustainability and secondary outcomes

Dlugonski, Deirdre, Motl, Robert W., Mohr, David C., Sandroff, Brian M.·2012·Psychology, Health & Medicine

Abstract

Physical activity is associated with many benefits, but persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) are less physically active than the general population. There is a critical need for research on methods of increasing and sustaining the physical activity levels of this population. This randomized controlled trial examined the efficacy of an Internet-delivered and theory-based behavioral intervention that was supplemented with video coaching for increasing and sustaining physical activity over time in persons with MS. Physically inactive, ambulatory persons with MS (N = 45) were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 22) or control (n = 23) conditions and completed a battery of questionnaires before, after, and three months after a 12-week intervention period. Data analyses were conducted in PASW 18.0. Partial eta squared ([Formula: see text]) effect size indicated that there was a large, statistically significant condition-by-time interaction on physical activity ([Formula: see text]). Cohen's d effect sizes indicated that the intervention group had a large increase in physical activity after the 12-week trial (d = .98) that was sustained over a three-month follow-up (d = .79). The current study supports the efficacy of a behavioral intervention for increasing and sustaining physical activity in a sample of persons with MS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13548506.2011.652640

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 133

Authors
Dlugonski, D., Motl, R. W., Mohr, D. C., & Sandroff, B. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Motl, Robert W.
Venue
Psychology, Health & Medicine
Published
2012-12
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
636-651
ISSN
  • 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3966
OpenAlex
W2124802874
Cited by
133
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology Health & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, physical activity, online intervention, behavioral interventions, video coaching, theory-based intervention, secondary outcomes
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Multiple Sclerosis, Treatment Outcome, Remote Consultation, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review