The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Just green enough: contesting environmental gentrification in Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Abstract
While sustainability and green urbanism have become buzzwords in urban policy circles, too little analysis has focused on who gets to decide what green looks like. Many visions of the green city seem to have room only for park space, waterfront cafes, and luxury LEED-certified buildings, prompting concern that there is no place in the “sustainable” city for industrial uses and the working class. We will use the case study of Newtown Creek in Brooklyn, New York, to explore how different visions for the green city are enacted through activism and policy-making. Neighbourhood residents and business owners seem to be advocating a strategy we call “just green enough”, in order to achieve environmental remediation without environmental gentrification. Following the crash of both the financial and real estate markets, attempts to construct a sustainable city that is economically diverse and socially just seem to be taking hold. We interrogate how urban sustainability can be used to open up a space for diversity and democracy in the neoliberal city and argue that there is space for interventions that challenge the presumed inevitability of gentrification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Capital, Crime Control and Statecraft in the Entrepreneurial City
Coleman, R., Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2005) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1080/00420980500380428 · Cited by 56
Cited by
Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J. T., Masip, L., & Pearsall, H. (2018) · Urban Geography · doi:10.1080/02723638.2017.1349987 · Cited by 521
Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J., Garcia-Lamarca, M., Cole, H., & Pearsall, H. (2019) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132518803799 · Cited by 416
Climate gentrification: from theory to empiricism in Miami-Dade County, Florida
Keenan, J. M., Hill, T., & Gumber, A. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabb32 · Cited by 351
“…Gentrification,’ wherein investments in sustainability amenities and infrastructure are unevenly distributed or otherwise associated with gentrification (Checker 2011, Curran and Hamilton 2012, Bryson 2013, Sandberg 2014, Curran and Hamilton 2017, Gould and Lewis 2017, Anguelovski et al 2018).”
BackgroundSustainable remediation and redevelopment of brownfield sites
Hou, D., Al-Tabbaa, A., O’Connor, D., Hu, Q., Zhu, Y.-G., Wang, L., Kirkwood, N., Ok, Y. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Bolan, N. S., et al. (2023) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-023-00404-1 · Cited by 338
Shokry, G., Connolly, J. J., & Anguelovski, I. (2020) · Urban Climate · doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100539 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Curran, W., & Hamilton, T.
- Venue
- Local Environment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1027-1042
- ISSN
- 1354-9839 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-6711
- OpenAlex
- W2067031805
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Just green enough: contesting environmental gentrification in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13549839.2012.729569
- The paper
- Curran, W., & Hamilton, T. (2012). Just green enough: contesting environmental gentrification in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. Local Environment. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.729569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.