Cited by 95Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityWaste Management and RecyclingEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Household food waste: the implications of consumer choice in food from purchase to disposal

Tucker, C.A., Farrelly, T.·2016·Local Environment

Abstract

Food and food-related waste is a high priority in terms of waste minimisation in New Zealand. Over the summer of 2012–2013, a survey of 147 participants was conducted on a range of views and practices related to environmental challenges and understandings. The survey, undertaken in Palmerston North, New Zealand, captured a wide socio-demographic. This article focuses on respondents’ food practices from purchase, to plate, to disposal and the environmental implications of these practices. The survey data have allowed an enriched understanding of both individual and structural level challenges as well as incentives towards improving environmental practices in relation to household food waste minimisation. The results indicated that, in keeping with other research in this area, food waste increases according to the number of individuals in a household, and in particular the number of younger people. Also, while the majority of participants were at least “somewhat concerned” about their households’ environmental impact, over three quarters of participant households put food waste into their rubbish bin. Some solutions and directions to further progress research, policy, and practice in this area are offered, and include the need for more direct and personalised communication regarding waste minimisation, along with the provision of kerbside food waste collections. It is clear that individual- or household-level changes are important and must be supported systemically by both local body and state level legislation and initiatives, if there is to be any substantial decline in food waste going to landfill.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13549839.2015.1015972

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Younger persons focus more on the financial dimensions of food waste while older people indicate more concern about its social and environmental consequences.

    “Younger persons, for instance, focus more on the financial dimensions of food waste while older people indicate more concern about its social and environmental consequences (Blichfeldt et al., 2015;Tucker and Farrelly, 2015a).”
  • A focus on disposal practices, such as recycling or composting, often undermines people's motivation for waste prevention.

    “A focus on disposal practices, such as recycling or composting, often undermines people's motivation for waste prevention (Cecere et al., 2014;Tucker and Farrelly, 2015).”
  • Leaflets, word of mouth, and television shows or movies are especially effective ways to deliver information.

    “With regards to information channels, Qi and Roe (2016) as well as Tucker and Farrelly (2015) show that leaflets, word of mouth, and television shows or movies are especially effective ways to deliver information.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 95

Authors
Tucker, C. A., & Farrelly, T.
Affiliations
Massey University (NZ)
Corresponding author
Tucker, C.A.
Venue
Local Environment
Published
2015-03-10
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
682-706
ISSN
  • 1354-9839 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-6711
OpenAlex
W2006055863
Cited by
95
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
FWCI
10.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Local Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
household food waste, food purchasing, food disposal, household size, youth, environmental concern, landfill waste, waste management regulation, New Zealand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review