The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 2030 Agenda: challenges of implementation to attain gender equality and women's rights
Abstract
Moving beyond the narrow goals and targets of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and the top-down manner in which they were defined, the 2030 Agenda promises to address many of their shortcomings. Not only has the process of defining the new agenda been more inclusive and its scope a universal one, but it is also anchored in human rights principles, while its goals and targets draw attention to a far more variegated set of structural concerns. This is evident in the remarkably broad scope of the targets under the gender-specific Goal 5. But the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), like the MDGs, are somewhat silent on the policies needed to achieve the goals and targets. When it comes to the gender-specific elements, while the SDGs do a far better job than the MDGs in drawing attention to key structural constraints that hold back women's enjoyment of their rights, on some of the more contested issues they hardly advance the agenda beyond what has been the ‘agreed language’ for decades. At the same time, the hard-won gains and vision of the SDGs, including SDG 5, may be difficult to realise unless the dominant economic model that forms the backdrop is changed, and stronger accountability mechanisms are put in place. In the absence of robust accountability mechanisms, the risk of dilution and selectivity in the process of implementation looms large.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HTUN, M., & WELDON, S. L. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000226 · Cited by 652
Cited by
SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth – A gendered analysis
Rai, S. M., Brown, B. D., & Ruwanpura, K. N. (2019) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.006 · Cited by 369
Leahy, C., Winterford, K., Nghiem, T., Kelleher, J., Leong, L., & Willetts, J. (2017) · Gender & Development · doi:10.1080/13552074.2017.1331530 · Cited by 46
Fang, J., Tang, S., Tan, X., & Tolhurst, R. (2020) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/s12978-020-00924-9 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Razavi, S.
- Venue
- Gender & Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-01-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-41
- ISSN
- 1355-2074 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-9221
- OpenAlex
- W2283610685
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 2030 Agenda: challenges of implementation to attain gender equality and women's rights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13552074.2016.1142229
- The paper
- Razavi, S. (2016). The 2030 Agenda: challenges of implementation to attain gender equality and women's rights. Gender & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2016.1142229
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.