Cited by 13Digital Economy and Work TransformationEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesLegal and Labor Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Locating women workers in the platform economy in India – old wine in a new bottle?

Abstract

Using the feminist lens of women economic empowerment and the concepts of resources, agency, and achievements, and the inter-related concepts of power, this article shares the experience of women beauty workers and women cab drivers working on different types of platform models in India. While beauty work is essentially a feminised sector of work in India, ride-hailing is a male-dominated form of work. The analysis is drawn from in-depth interviews with women workers, platform management, and union leaders, among others, to understand struggles and ways of ‘being and doing’ of women workers on platforms. The article presents the different types of platform models – freelance, fixed salary, and hybrid – and the differential impacts of these models on the working conditions of the women in these two sectors. The article then continues to unravel the concept of ‘flexibility and autonomy’, and the precarious nature of work for these different contractual arrangements as well as the implications of algorithmic controls and management on women workers. It eventually highlights that this ‘new’ gig economy contributes to the continuation of the informal nature of work, along with the precarity of the same, which hinders their ability to achieve empowerment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13552074.2022.2131258

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Batliwala Srilatha, 2007, Development in Practice, 17, 557, 10.1080/09614520701469559 · DOI
  2. 10.1257/jel.50.4.1051 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Flanagan F., 2019, Journal of Industrial Relations, 61, 57, 10.1177/0022185618800518 · DOI
  4. Gearhart D., 2017, Towards a Fairer Gig Economy, 13
  5. Hunt, Abigail, Emma Samman, Sherry Tapfuma, Grace Mwaura, Rhoda Omenya, Kay Kim, Sara Stevano and Aida Roumer (2019) ‘Women in the gig economy Paid work, care and flexibility in Kenya and South Africa’, ODI. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21408.53760 (last checked 3 September 2022). · DOI
  6. 10.1111/1467-7660.00125 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kabeer Naila, 2021, Women’s Economic Empowerment: Insights from Africa and South Asia, 13, 10.4324/9781003141938-3 · DOI
  8. Kantor Paula, 2006, Economic and Political Weekly, 41, 2089
  9. Lama Sita, 2018, Journal of Academic Research in Economics, 10, 482
  10. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1607762 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/14748851221082078 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/13552074.2014.920976 · DOI
  13. Rani Uma, 2019, Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal. Automation, Artificial Intelligence, & Labor Law, 41, 263
  14. 10.1080/0961452951000157074 · DOI
  15. Rubery Jill, 2019, Journal of International Affairs, 72, 91
  16. Sen, Amartya (1995) ‘Inequality reexamined’, Harvard University Press. (last checked on 3 September 2022). · DOI
  17. 10.1386/macp.14.1.35_1 · DOI
  18. van Doorn Neils, 2017, Information, Communication & Society, 20, 898, 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1108/01437720210432239 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/2031952520953856 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ghosh, A., Zaidi, M., & Ramachandran, R.
Corresponding author
Ghosh, Anweshaa
Venue
Gender & Development
Published
2022-09-02
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
765-784
ISSN
  • 1355-2074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-9221
OpenAlex
W4313186571
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Gender & Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1182604)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
platform economy, women's employment, ride-hailing, gig economy, women's economic empowerment, precarious employment, algorithmic control, platform management, informal employment, gender and work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review