The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Female sex offenders who abuse children whilst working in organisational contexts: offending, conviction and sentencing
Open accessAbstract
To date, there has been very little research into the phenomenon of female-perpetrated institutional child sexual abuse (CSA). This study explored 71 cases of CSA perpetrated by women working with children, considered by UK police and courts between 2000 and 2016. Qualitative and quantitative content analysis was employed to examine court reports, professional regulatory body decisions, media reports and an online sentencing database in order to identify perpetrator and victim characteristics, the nature of the offending behaviour, modus operandi and criminal justice system responses. Findings indicate most women offended alone and had no previous criminal or employment records of concern. Victims were typically male and 15–16 years old. Most women received custodial sentences, typically of 2–3 years in length. Implications for policy and practice are also discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“in a review of all female-perpetrated child sexual abuse cases from 2000 to 2016 in the UK (Darling et al., 2018), the majority were committed by educators and with indications of sexual grooming being present in two thirds of all cases.”
From 3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Darling et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Here, the data suggested that the female offenders established close relationships with their victims and sent flirtatious text messages before the abuse occurred.”
From 3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Darling et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- 10.1177/0886260515603976 · DOI
- 10.17265/2160-6579 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.08.006 · DOI
- 10.1080/10538712.2014.929607 · DOI
- Bunting L., 2005, Females who sexually offend against children: Responses of the child protection and criminal justice systems
- Children’s Commissioner for England, 2017, Defining child vulnerability: Definitions, frameworks and groups
- Children’s Commissioner for England, 2017, On measuring the number of vulnerable children in England
- Colton M., 1996, Betrayal of trust: Sexual abuse by men who work with children … in their own words
- 10.1177/0093854816658923 · DOI
- Cortoni F., 2009, Revue internationale de criminologie et de police technique et scientifique, 62, 319
- Danvin P. A., 1999, Female sexual abusers: Three views, 9
- Darling A. J., 2013, International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 2, 525, 10.6000/1929-4409.2013.02.47 · DOI
- Denov M. S., 2004, Perspectives on female sexual offending: A culture of denial
- 10.1177/0886260504269093 · DOI · Paper page
- Dunbar T., 1999, Female sexual abusers: Three perspectives, 311
- 10.1177/1557085111430214 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781119943228 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781119943228.ch4 · DOI
- Faller K. C., 1987, Violence and Victims, 2, 263, 10.1891/0886-6708.2.4.263 · DOI
- 10.1300/J070v04n03_02 · DOI
- Finkelhor D., 1988, Nursery crimes: Sexual abuse in day care
- 10.1080/10538710903035305 · DOI
- Frketic K., 2010, Alternative Law Journal, 35, 142
- 10.1093/bjsw/30.6.795 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1177/1079063208322495 · DOI
- 10.1080/13218719.2012.728428 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00101-X · DOI
- Hislop J., 1999, Female sexual abusers: Three views, 135
- Jaffe P., 2013, Education Law Journal, 23, 19
- 10.1177/088626095010003006 · DOI
- 10.1375/pplt.2004.11.2.308 · DOI
- 10.1080/10538712.2010.495047 · DOI
- 10.1186/s40163-015-0044-3 · DOI
- 10.1080/13552600412331321314 · DOI
- Mackelprang E., 2015, Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment
- Mathews R., 1989, Female sexual offenders: An exploratory study
- Matravers A., 2013, Sex offenders in the community, 10.4324/9781315065618 · DOI
- 10.1080/10538712.2015.978925 · DOI
- 10.1080/10683160902776850 · DOI
- 10.1080/10538712.2010.495046 · DOI
- 10.1080/13218710109525003 · DOI
- 10.1163/174413610X493791 · DOI
- 10.1002/ab.20047 · DOI
- 10.1348/135532505X68692 · DOI
- Proeve M., 2016, Evidence and frameworks for understanding perpetrators of institutional child sexual abuse
- 10.1080/10538712.2014.870275 · DOI
- Reid S. S., 2011, Whittier Journal of Child and Family Advocacy, 11, 353
- Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, 2017, Final information update
- 10.1177/107906320701900201 · DOI
- 10.1080/13552600.2010.537380 · DOI
- Saradjian J., 1996, Women who sexually abuse children: From research to clinical practice
- 10.1002/9780470666715.ch2 · DOI
- Shakeshaft C., 2004, Educator sexual misconduct: A synthesis of existing literature
- 10.1521/bumc.2012.76.2.172 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2458-14-282 · DOI
- Stennis J., 2006, Journal of Law & Education, 35, 395
- 10.1002/car.737 · DOI
- 10.1080/13552600410001667788 · DOI
- 10.1177/0306624X09359194 · DOI
- 10.1177/0093854808314469 · DOI
- 10.1177/107906320401600203 · DOI
- 10.1177/073401680202700205 · DOI
- 10.1177/0093854890017003004 · DOI
- 10.1093/clipsy.bpg021 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring sexual grooming in female perpetrated child sexual abuse
Kaylor, L. E., Winters, G. M., & Jeglic, E. L. (2022) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2021.1994505 · Cited by 21
The prevalence of sexual grooming behaviors among survivors of childhood sexual abuse
Winters, G. M., Jeglic, E. L., Johnson, B. N., & Chou, C. (2024) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106842 · Cited by 17
Female perpetrators of child sexual abuse in the United States
Scurich, N. (2023) · Journal of Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1108/jcp-07-2023-0045 · Cited by 14
3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature
Schmidt, A. F. (2025) · Sexual Online Grooming of Children · doi:10.5771/9783748903291-135 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Darling, A. J., Hackett, S., & Jamie, K.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Darling, Andrea J.
- Venue
- Journal of Sexual Aggression
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-05-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 196-214
- ISSN
- 1355-2600 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-6545
- OpenAlex
- W2808386671
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Sexual Aggression (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/1447912)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
- Keywords
- female sexual offenders, child sexual abuse, institutional child sexual abuse, modus operandi, sentencing, custodial sentences, criminal conviction, offender characteristics, victim characteristics, professional regulatory bodies, criminal justice response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review