Influence of beliefs about cervical cancer etiology on pap smear use among Latina immigrants
Open accessAbstract
Objective To assess Latina immigrants' beliefs about the role of sexual activities in cervical cancer etiology and the impact of the beliefs on Papanicolaou (Pap) smear use. Previous research has found that Latinas, particularly immigrants, believe that cervical cancer is related to 'unwise' sexual activities; however, their beliefs about the nature of the relationship are unclear. Design We conducted semi-structured face-to-face interviews with a non-probability purposive sample of 20 Mexican immigrant women who resided in Orange County, California regarding their beliefs about risk factors for cervical cancer and Pap smear use. We used qualitative content analysis to identify major themes. Three investigators independently reviewed transcripts of the audio-taped interviews to identify themes and came to a consensus about them. Results The women had a mean age of 39 years and had resided in the USA for an average of 16.3 years. We identified several themes. The majority of respondents had limited knowledge about cervical cancer and no knowledge about human papillomavirus (HPV); believed that infections caused by physical trauma, certain sexual activities, and poor hygiene caused cervical cancer; believed that they only needed a Pap smear if they developed symptoms of a pelvic infection; and felt that women who engaged in 'unwise' sexual behaviors, in particular, should receive regular Pap smear exams. Conclusion The results suggest that culturally related beliefs about the e…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Knowledge and perception play a key role in influencing screening behavior.
“As has been previously documented, knowledge and perception play a key role in influencing screening behavior [47–51].”
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oketch, S. Y., Kwena, Z., Choi, Y., Adewumi, K., Moghadassi, M., Bukusi, E. A., & Huchko, M. J. (2019) · BMC Women's Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-019-0778-2 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mcmullin, J. M., Alba, I. D., Chávez, L. R., & Hubbell, F. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Venue
- Ethnicity & Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-18
- ISSN
- 1355-7858 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3419
- OpenAlex
- W2168454374
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Ethnicity and Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA062203)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Keywords
- cervical cancer, Pap smear screening, Latina immigrants, Mexican immigrant women, sexual behavior, human papillomavirus, cervical cancer risk factors, health beliefs
- MeSH terms
- Adult, California, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Emigration and Immigration, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Sexual Behavior, Vaginal Smears, Papanicolaou Test
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review