Cited by 17Mental Health Treatment and AccessGender Roles and Identity StudiesRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Exploring mental illness stigma among Asian men mobilized to become Community Mental Health Ambassadors in Toronto Canada

Fung, Kenneth Po-Lun, Liu, Jenny J. W., Sin, Rick, Bender, Amy, Shakya, Yogendra, Butt, Naila, Wong, Josephine Pui-Hing·2022·Ethnicity & Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stigma of mental illness contributes to silence, denial and delayed help seeking. Existing stigma reduction strategies seldom consider gender and cultural contexts. PURPOSE: The Strengths in Unity study was a multi-site Canadian study that engaged Asian men in three stigma reduction interventions (ACT, CEE, psychoeducation) and mobilized them as Community Mental Health Ambassadors. Our participants included both men living with or affected by mental illness (LWA) as well as community leaders (CL). This paper will: (1) describe the baseline characteristics of the Toronto participants including their sociodemographic information, mental illness stigma (CAMI and ISMI), attitudes towards social change (SJS), and intervention-related process variables (AAQ-II, VLQ, FMI, Empowerment); (2) compare the differences among these variables between LWA and CL; and (3) explore factors that may correlate with socio-economic status and mental health stigma. RESULTS: A total of 609 Asian men were recruited in Toronto, Canada. Both CL and LWA had similar scores on measures of external and internalized stigma and social change attitudes, except that LWA had more positive views about the acceptance and integration of those with mental illness into the community on the CAMI, while CL had a higher level of perceived behavioral control on the SJS. Group differences were also observed between LWA and CL in some process-related variables. Exploratory analysis suggests that younger and more educated participants had lower stigma. CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore the importance of engaging both community leaders and people with lived experience as mental health advocates to address stigma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13557858.2019.1640350

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 17

Authors
Fung, K. P.-L., Liu, J. J. W., Sin, R., Bender, A., Shakya, Y., Butt, N., & Wong, J. P.-H.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
  • Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services (CA)
  • Bilal Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Corresponding author
Fung, Kenneth Po-Lun
Venue
Ethnicity & Health
Published
2019-07-24
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
100-118
ISSN
  • 1355-7858 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3419
OpenAlex
W2963669068
Cited by
17
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ethnicity and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Movember Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
mental health stigma, Asian men, stigma reduction interventions, community leaders, lived experience, perceived behavioral control, empowerment, socioeconomic status, gender and culture, Toronto
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Canada, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Asian People, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review