Exploring the role of simulation to foster interprofessional teamwork among medical and nursing students: A mixed-method pilot investigation in Hong Kong
Abstract
Effective teamwork is a critical component of maintaining patient safety. However, there is lack of clarity on the best teaching approach to interprofessional teamwork training in medical and nursing curricula. This study aimed to compare the effects of blended classroom plus clinical simulation versus clinical simulation alone on teamwork attitudes, perceptions and performance in medical and nursing students in Hong Kong. This was a pilot study with a mixed-method research design, with both quantitative and qualitative evaluations. Students who studied medicine or nursing courses at a university in Hong Kong were invited to this study. They were assigned into two groups: clinical simulation alone versus blended classroom plus clinical simulation. The primary outcome was attitudinal change related to teamwork behaviours, which was measured using the Human Factors Attitude Survey. The secondary outcomes were perceptions of team-based learning and teamwork performance, which were accessed by the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument and Ottawa Global Rating Scale, respectively. Four focus group interviews were conducted after the training sessions. Conventional content analysis using inductive coding was performed with the qualitative data. Forty-six students participated in this study. There was a significant increase in the participants’ positive attitudes on teamwork for both groups (intervention: MD = 5.36 and control: MD = 3.6, p <.05); however, there was no significant difference on increasing positive attitudes between the groups (estimate = 1.76, 95% CI [−8.59, 5.06], p = .61). Qualitative analysis identified four themes: (1) reconsidering professional roles in managing patients; (2) embodying the experience to share responsibility and complement each other’s skills; (3) realizing the importance of trust and communication; and (4) engaging to achieve the mission within a limited time. This pilot study found that a blended classroom did not further improve teamwork attitudes, perceptions and performance in medical and nursing students compared with clinical simulation alone. Qualitative findings showed that students had reconsidered their professional roles in managing patients and realized the importance of teamwork in caring patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simulations support skill acquisition and confidence building in a safe, realistic setting.
“By replicating real-world challenges without the risk to actual patients, simulations support skill acquisition and confidence building in a safe, yet realistic, setting [100,101].”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [101]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Wai, A. K., Lam, V. S., Ng, Z. L., Pang, M. T., Tsang, V. W., Lee, J. J., & Wong, J. Y.
- Affiliations
- Emergency Medicine Unit, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, S.A.R., China
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- School of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, S.A.R., China
- Venue
- Journal of Interprofessional Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-12-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 890-898
- ISSN
- 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9567
- OpenAlex
- W3111700982
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Interprofessional Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Teaching Development Grant, The University of Hong Kong (710)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- interprofessional collaboration, clinical simulation, blended learning, medical students, nursing students, teamwork attitudes, team-based learning, teamwork performance, patient safety, professional roles, trust and communication, interprofessional education
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Hong Kong, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Patient Care Team, Pilot Projects, Research Design, Students, Medical, Students, Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review