Implementation of child mental health service improvement plans in four low- and middle-income countries: stakeholders’ perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Children in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) have high levels of unmet mental health needs, especially in disadvantaged communities. To address this gap, we developed a child mental health service improvement programme. This was co-facilitated using interprofessional principles and values in four countries, South Africa, Kenya, Turkey and Brazil. Eighteen stakeholders from different professions were interviewed after six months on their perspectives on enabling factors and challenges they faced in implementing service plans. Participants valued the holistic case management approach and scaled service model that underpinned the service plans. Emerging themes on participants' priorities related to service user participation, integrated care, and different levels of capacity-building. We propose that an integrated care model in LMIC contexts can maximize available resources, engage families and mobilize communities. Implementation requires concurrent actions at micro-, meso- and macro-level.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Petersen, I., van Rensburg, A., Kigozi, F., Semrau, M., Hanlon, C., Abdulmalik, J., Kola, L., Fekadu, A., Gureje, O., Gurung, D., et al. (2019) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2019.7 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Evaluation of district mental healthcare plans: The PRIME consortium methodology
De Silva, M. J., Rathod, S. D., Hanlon, C., Breuer, E., Chisholm, D., Fekadu, A., Jordans, M., Kigozi, F., Petersen, I., Shidhaye, R., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.114.153858 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Eruyar, S., Haffejee, S., Anderson, E., & Vostanis, P.
- Affiliations
- Necmettin Erbakan University
- University of Johannesburg (ZA)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Vostanis, Panos
- Venue
- Journal of Interprofessional Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-10-17
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 982-989
- ISSN
- 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9567
- OpenAlex
- W3206968754
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Interprofessional Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- the Grand Challenges Research Fund
- Grand Challenges Research Fund, Globall Impact Acceleration Rapid Response
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- child mental health services, service improvement plan, implementation barriers and facilitators, stakeholder perspectives, interprofessional collaboration, integrated care, service user involvement, capacity building, family involvement, community mobilization, low- and middle-income countries, unmet mental health needs
- MeSH terms
- Stakeholder Participation, Brazil, Child, Child Health Services, Developing Countries, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Kenya, Mental Health Services, South Africa, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Capacity Building, Quality Improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review