The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Collaborative clinical reasoning learning using an integrated care pathway in undergraduate interprofessional education: An explorative study
Abstract
Chaina Hanuma, Ardi Findyartinibc* & Diantha Soemantribca Master Program in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesiab Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesiac Faculty of Medicine, Medical Education Center, Indonesia Medical Education & Research Institute (IMERI), Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaChaina Hanum, MD, MMedEd is a graduate from Master in Medical Education Program at Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia and currently a researcher in Medical Education Cluster, Indonesia Medical Education and Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia.Ardi Findyartini, MD, PhD, is an Associate Professor in medical education. She is currently the Coordinator of Community Service, Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia and the Chair of Medical Education Cluster, Indonesia Medical Education and Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia.Diantha Soemantri, MD, MMedEd, PhD, is an Associate Professor in medical education. She is currently the Head of Master in Medical Education, Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia and the Vice Chair Education, Indonesia Medical Education and Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia.CONTACT Ardi Findyartini ardi.findyartini@ui.ac.id Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaABSTRACTCollaborative clinical reasoning (CCR) is part of interprofessional collaborative practice and aims to negotiate and manage patient problems. An integrated care pathway (ICP) can be used as a framework for developing comprehensive patient care, typically in a clinical setting. This study aims to explore the CCR process in undergraduate interprofessional teams and the use of ICP as guidance in discussing a patient’s problem and its comprehensive management. This is a qualitative study following phenomenology and was performed in an interprofessional education (IPE) program held by Health Science Cluster Universitas Indonesia. A total of four observations involving 40 students and four focus-group discussions involving 18 students from different health professions backgrounds were conducted to explore the CCR process using the ICP framework. In-depth interviews with four tutors from different health professions backgrounds and document analysis were also conducted as triangulation processes. This study shows that CCR was held in two stages – individual and group. The ICP framework could be used as a guiding tool in the CCR process to discuss the patient’s management and discharge plan. This study also demonstrates that there are several challenges in this learning process, including the clinical case used in the discussion, the need for prior knowledge and previous exposure to IPE and the ICP framework, and health professions’ dominance during the discussion. This study provides evidence on learning of CCR using the ICP framework as a guiding tool in a pre-licensure IPE program. This approach is useful for preparing students to develop an interprofessional, comprehensive, and holistic health care plan and to help them understand the roles of each profession.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- 10.1080/13561820.2017.1394279 · DOI
- Ajjawi R., 2019, Clinical reasoning in the health professions, 397
- American Dental Education Association, 2008, ADEA Competencies for the New General Dentist
- 10.1016/S1130-8621(18)30076-7 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00101.x · DOI
- Australian Nursing & Midwifery Council, 2006, Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia
- 10.1080/13561820802054655 · DOI
- 10.1080/00405848709543265 · DOI
- 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1286309 · DOI
- 10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.133 · DOI
- 10.1080/13561820120039874 · DOI
- 10.11622/smedj.2018093 · DOI
- 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182763312 · DOI
- 10.3109/13561820.2012.757730 · DOI
- Evans-Lacko S., 2010, BMC Health Serv Res, 10
- Frank J. R., 2015, CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework
- 10.3109/13561820.2014.969835 · DOI
- Grimmer K., 2008, Clinical reasoning in the health professions, 309
- 10.1080/10833196.2018.1450327 · DOI
- Hood K., 2013, Nurse Educ Pract, 14, 1
- Indonesian Ministry of Health, 2020, Health Profile of Indonesia Year 2019
- Interprofessional Education Collaborative, 2016, Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: 2016 update
- Johnson E., 2017, J Student-Run Clin, 3, 1, 10.59586/jsrc.v3i1.24 · DOI
- Khatami S., 2019, Clinical reasoning in the health professions, 261
- Kiesewetter J., 2016, J Interprof Care, 30, 1, 10.3109/13561820.2015.1111052 · DOI
- 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000158 · DOI
- Kreps G. L, 2016, International Arch Nurs Heal Care, 2, 051
- Lawal A. K., 2016, BMC Med, 14, 1
- 10.1186/s12909-019-1802-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03391699 · DOI
- 10.3109/13561820.2012.663013 · DOI
- 10.15265/IY-2017-035 · DOI
- 10.5172/hesr.2013.22.3.291 · DOI
- Mobley W. C., 2019, Clinical reasoning in the health professions, 323
- 10.22230/jripe.2012v2n3a96 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15328015TLM1203_2 · DOI
- Pharmacy Council of New Zealand, 2015, Competence Standards for the Pharmacy Profession
- Purnamasari D, 2018, Acta Med Indones, 50, 273
- 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173663 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-7020-4964-4.00001-8 · DOI
- Ritter B. J., 2019, Clinical reasoning in the health professions, 235
- Sari P. S., 2020, Makara J Health Res, 24, 104
- Schlipalius M., 2018, AMEE Conference
- Schwartz A., 2019, Clinical reasoning in the health professions, 223
- 10.1016/j.cptl.2012.05.007 · DOI
- 10.3109/13561820.2014.921899 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0180398 · DOI
- 10.1080/13561820.2019.1634016 · DOI
- Soemantri D., 2019, J Interprof Care, 34, 1
- Thistlethwaite J. E., 2017, A practical guide for medical teachers, 128
- Van Dongen J. J. J., 2016, BMC Fam Pract, 17
- 10.1093/fampra/cmw106 · DOI
- 10.3109/13561820.2011.592229 · DOI
- Vo R., 2019, Clinical reasoning in the health professions, 313
- 10.3109/13561820.2011.566647 · DOI
- World Health Organization, 2011, Patient Safety Curriculum Guide: Multi-professional Edition
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanum, C., Findyartini, A., & Soemantri, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Indonesia (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Findyartini, Ardi
- Venue
- Journal of Interprofessional Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-07-26
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 438-447
- ISSN
- 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9567
- OpenAlex
- W4288010060
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Interprofessional Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- by University of Indonesia
- Universitas Indonesia
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- integrated care pathways, interprofessional education, undergraduate medical students, interprofessional collaborative practice, discharge planning, multidisciplinary team, health professions education, barriers to learning, shared decision-making, patient safety, quality of care, patient satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Interprofessional Education, Health Occupations, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Students, Health Occupations, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaborative clinical reasoning learning using an integrated care pathway in undergraduate interprofessional education: An explorative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13561820.2022.2086221
- The paper
- Hanum, C., Findyartini, A., & Soemantri, D. (2023). Collaborative clinical reasoning learning using an integrated care pathway in undergraduate interprofessional education: An explorative study. Journal of Interprofessional Care. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2022.2086221