The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice
Abstract
The ability to work with professionals from other disciplines to deliver collaborative, patient-centred care is considered a critical element of professional practice requiring a specific set of competencies. However, a generally accepted framework for collaborative competencies is missing, which makes consistent preparation of students and staff challenging. Some authors have argued that there is a lack of conceptual clarity of the "active ingredients" of collaboration relating to quality of care and patient outcomes, which may be at the root of the competencies issue. As part of a large Health Canada funded study focused on interprofessional education and collaborative practice, our goal was to understand the competencies for collaborative practice that are considered most relevant by health professionals working at the front line. Interview participants comprised 60 health care providers from various disciplines. Understanding and appreciating professional roles and responsibilities and communicating effectively emerged as the two perceived core competencies for patient-centred collaborative practice. For both competencies there is evidence of a link to positive patient and provider outcomes. We suggest that these two competencies should be the primary focus of student and staff education aimed at increasing collaborative practice skills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601
Kripalani, S., LeFevre, F., Phillips, C. O., Williams, M. V., Basaviah, P., & Baker, D. W. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.8.831 · Cited by 2,103
Cavanagh, S. (1997) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2 · Cited by 1,133
Cited by
Schot, E., Tummers, L., & Noordegraaf, M. (2020) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2019.1636007 · Cited by 579
Lingard, L., McDougall, A., Levstik, M., Chandok, N., Spafford, M. M., & Schryer, C. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04339.x · Cited by 138
Teaching medical students to communicate with empathy and clarity using improvisation
Kaplan-Liss, E., Lantz-Gefroh, V., Bass, E., Killebrew, D., Ponzio, N. M., Savi, C., & O’Connell, C. (2018) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002031 · Cited by 105
Chen, J. H., Björkman, A., Zou, J. H., & Engström, M. (2019) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2019.04.014 · Cited by 103
Leadership in interprofessional collaboration in health care
Folkman, A. K., Tveit, B., & Sverdrup, S. (2019) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s189199 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Suter, E., Arndt, J., Arthur, N., Parboosingh, J., Taylor, E., & Deutschlander, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Interprofessional Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-51
- ISSN
- 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9567
- OpenAlex
- W2132542620
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 40.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13561820802338579
- The paper
- Suter, E., Arndt, J., Arthur, N., Parboosingh, J., Taylor, E., & Deutschlander, S. (2009). Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820802338579
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.