Attitudes towards collaboration and servant leadership among nurses, physicians and residents
Abstract
A descriptive, comparative study was conducted to examine the attitudes of nurses, physicians and residents towards collaboration and to assess their self-perception of servant leadership characteristics. The Jefferson Scale of Attitudes toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration and the Barbuto-Wheeler Servant Leadership Questionnaire were utilized for data collection. Registered nurses (RNs) (n = 2,660), physicians (n = 447) and residents (n = 171) in a Southeastern United States health system were surveyed via the intranet; there were 497 responses for analysis. The response rate should be considered and generalizations made with caution regarding the study results. RN scores were higher for both total scores and subscales as compared to physician/resident groups for collaboration and servant leadership. There was a weak positive correlation between collaboration and servant leadership in the RN group and no significant correlation between the variables in the physician/resident group. Findings from this study have implications for nursing and physician education and practice and may serve as a framework for future studies. Representative samples are needed to gain further insight and to guide future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Servant leadership is positively related with helping behavior, collaboration among nurses, self-rated employee corporate social responsibility, and proactive behavior.
“In the same vein, servant leadership is also found to be positively related with helping behavior (Neubert et al., 2016), collaboration among nurses (Garber, Madigan, Click, & Fitzpatrick, 2009), self-rated employee corporate social responsibility (Grisaffe, VanMeter, & Chonko, 2016), and proactive behavior (Bande, Fernández-Ferrín, Varela-Neira, & Otero-Neira, 2016).”
From Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019) · cites this paper as Garber, Madigan, Click, & Fitzpatrick, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis
van Dierendonck, D. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310380462 · Cited by 2,218 · see citing works
Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004 · Cited by 1,858 · see citing works
A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts
Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1322-6 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Antecedents of Servant Leadership: A Mixed Methods Study
Beck, C. D. (2014) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051814529993 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garber, J. S., Madigan, E. A., Click, E. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Jefferson College of Health Sciences (US)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Garber, Jeannie Scruggs
- Venue
- Journal of Interprofessional Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 331-340
- ISSN
- 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9567
- OpenAlex
- W2159912551
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Interprofessional Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Keywords
- interprofessional collaboration, servant leadership, nurse-physician collaboration, nurses, physicians, medical residents, self-perceived leadership, interprofessional attitudes, nursing education, physician training
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Leadership, Male, Middle Aged, Ohio, Patient Care Team, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Virginia, Physician-Nurse Relations, Interdisciplinary Communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review