Cited by 127Interprofessional Education and CollaborationNursing Roles and PracticesHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Attitudes towards collaboration and servant leadership among nurses, physicians and residents

Garber, Jeannie Scruggs, Madigan, Elizabeth A., Click, Elizabeth R., Fitzpatrick, Joyce J.·2009·Journal of Interprofessional Care

Abstract

A descriptive, comparative study was conducted to examine the attitudes of nurses, physicians and residents towards collaboration and to assess their self-perception of servant leadership characteristics. The Jefferson Scale of Attitudes toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration and the Barbuto-Wheeler Servant Leadership Questionnaire were utilized for data collection. Registered nurses (RNs) (n = 2,660), physicians (n = 447) and residents (n = 171) in a Southeastern United States health system were surveyed via the intranet; there were 497 responses for analysis. The response rate should be considered and generalizations made with caution regarding the study results. RN scores were higher for both total scores and subscales as compared to physician/resident groups for collaboration and servant leadership. There was a weak positive correlation between collaboration and servant leadership in the RN group and no significant correlation between the variables in the physician/resident group. Findings from this study have implications for nursing and physician education and practice and may serve as a framework for future studies. Representative samples are needed to gain further insight and to guide future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13561820902886253

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Servant leadership is positively related with helping behavior, collaboration among nurses, self-rated employee corporate social responsibility, and proactive behavior.

    “In the same vein, servant leadership is also found to be positively related with helping behavior (Neubert et al., 2016), collaboration among nurses (Garber, Madigan, Click, & Fitzpatrick, 2009), self-rated employee corporate social responsibility (Grisaffe, VanMeter, & Chonko, 2016), and proactive behavior (Bande, Fernández-Ferrín, Varela-Neira, & Otero-Neira, 2016).”

    From Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019) · cites this paper as Garber, Madigan, Click, & Fitzpatrick, 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garber, J. S., Madigan, E. A., Click, E. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Jefferson College of Health Sciences (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Garber, Jeannie Scruggs
Venue
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Published
2009-01
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
331-340
ISSN
  • 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9567
OpenAlex
W2159912551
Cited by
127
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interprofessional Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
interprofessional collaboration, servant leadership, nurse-physician collaboration, nurses, physicians, medical residents, self-perceived leadership, interprofessional attitudes, nursing education, physician training
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Leadership, Male, Middle Aged, Ohio, Patient Care Team, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Virginia, Physician-Nurse Relations, Interdisciplinary Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review