Cited by 22Second Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrating written communication skills: working towards a whole of course approach

Harris, Anne·2016·Teaching in Higher Education

Abstract

Australian universities, through their graduate attributes, claim that graduates have the ability to communicate, an attribute encompassing, at the least, written and oral literacies. Despite this claim, Australian universities have been criticised over the past decade for their lack of rigour in assessing this attribute; a criticism generally linked to perceived weaknesses in graduates’ English language proficiency (ELP). Indeed, evidence suggests that programmes designed to develop students’ English language skills are invariably add-ons, despite ELP being a significant facet of the ability to communicate. This paper explores the development, over a six-year period, of wide-ranging ELP policy and strategies within one Australian university. Basing decisions on research pointing to good practice, evidence collected through various trials, dialogue with stakeholders, and ongoing evaluation of all actions, this paper illustrates key factors in moving towards the integration of ELP within courses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13562517.2016.1138456

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Arkoudis S., 2014, Good Practice Report – English Language Proficiency
  2. Arkoudis S., 2009, The Impact of English Language Proficiency and Workplace Readiness on the Employment Outcomes of Tertiary International Students. A Study Commissioned by DEEWR
  3. Arkoudis S., 2010, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22, 169
  4. 10.1191/0265532202lt239oa · DOI
  5. 10.1207/s15434311laq0201_1 · DOI
  6. Bachman L. F., 1996, Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests
  7. Birrell B., 2006, People and Place, 14, 53
  8. Bradley D., 2008, Review of Australian Higher Education
  9. 10.1080/13562517.2012.711932 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/13562517.2011.611876 · DOI
  11. Clark R., 1997, The Politics of Writing
  12. Dunworth K., 2009, Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3, A1
  13. Dunworth K., 2013, Degrees of Proficiency: Building a Strategic Approach to University Students’ English Language Assessment and Development (Final Report)
  14. 10.1080/07294360903226403 · DOI
  15. Gee J. G., 1996, Social Linguistics and Literacies. Ideology in Discourse
  16. Greenberg K. L., 1992, Writing Program Administration, 16, 7
  17. 10.1080/03075070600922709 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Harris A., 2013, Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 7, A62
  19. Harris A., 2011, Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 5, A73
  20. Hyland K., 2004, Disciplinary Discourses. Social Interactions in Academic Writing, 10.3998/mpub.6719 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/13562510500239091 · DOI
  22. Jacobs C., 2007, Journal of Education, 41, 59
  23. 10.2989/16073614.2010.545025 · DOI
  24. 10.1207/s15434311laq0202_2 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/CBO9781139196581 · DOI
  26. Knoch U., 2012, Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 1, 31
  27. 10.1016/j.system.2009.12.006 · DOI
  28. Krause K.-L., 2005, The First Year Experience in Australian Universities: Findings from a Decade of National Studies
  29. 10.1080/0307507042000287230 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/03075079812331380364 · DOI
  31. 10.1558/japl.v4i1.5 · DOI
  32. 10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030108 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/0309877X.2011.645461 · DOI
  34. Messick S., 1989, Educational Measurement, 13
  35. 10.1080/15434303.2010.484516 · DOI
  36. Murray N., 2011, Ergo, 2, 27
  37. 10.1080/03075079.2014.981150 · DOI
  38. 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u · DOI
  39. Ransom L., 2009, Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3, A13
  40. 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.001 · DOI
  41. 10.1017/S0261444813000190 · DOI
  42. Thies A., 2014, Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8, A43
  43. Weir C. J., 2005, Language Testing and Validation, 10.1057/9780230514577 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/13562510600874268 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/03075079.2010.525630 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Harris, A.
Affiliations
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Harris, Anne
Venue
Teaching in Higher Education
Published
2016-01-29
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
287-300
ISSN
  • 1356-2517 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1294
OpenAlex
W2271969167
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
40.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teaching in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Keywords
English proficiency, writing skills, oral literacy, graduate competencies, curriculum integration, course design, English for academic purposes, university policy, Australian universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating written communication skills: working towards a whole of course approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13562517.2016.1138456
The paper
Harris, A. (2016). Integrating written communication skills: working towards a whole of course approach. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1138456