The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating written communication skills: working towards a whole of course approach
Abstract
Australian universities, through their graduate attributes, claim that graduates have the ability to communicate, an attribute encompassing, at the least, written and oral literacies. Despite this claim, Australian universities have been criticised over the past decade for their lack of rigour in assessing this attribute; a criticism generally linked to perceived weaknesses in graduates’ English language proficiency (ELP). Indeed, evidence suggests that programmes designed to develop students’ English language skills are invariably add-ons, despite ELP being a significant facet of the ability to communicate. This paper explores the development, over a six-year period, of wide-ranging ELP policy and strategies within one Australian university. Basing decisions on research pointing to good practice, evidence collected through various trials, dialogue with stakeholders, and ongoing evaluation of all actions, this paper illustrates key factors in moving towards the integration of ELP within courses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Many students in the Australian higher education system struggle with the demands of tertiary education because of language problems (Harris, 2016).”
From Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly (2019) · cites this paper as Harris, 2016
Citations
Cites
Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment
Bachman, L. F. (2002) · Language Testing · doi:10.1191/0265532202lt240oa · Cited by 318
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- Arkoudis S., 2014, Good Practice Report – English Language Proficiency
- Arkoudis S., 2009, The Impact of English Language Proficiency and Workplace Readiness on the Employment Outcomes of Tertiary International Students. A Study Commissioned by DEEWR
- Arkoudis S., 2010, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22, 169
- 10.1191/0265532202lt239oa · DOI
- 10.1207/s15434311laq0201_1 · DOI
- Bachman L. F., 1996, Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests
- Birrell B., 2006, People and Place, 14, 53
- Bradley D., 2008, Review of Australian Higher Education
- 10.1080/13562517.2012.711932 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562517.2011.611876 · DOI
- Clark R., 1997, The Politics of Writing
- Dunworth K., 2009, Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3, A1
- Dunworth K., 2013, Degrees of Proficiency: Building a Strategic Approach to University Students’ English Language Assessment and Development (Final Report)
- 10.1080/07294360903226403 · DOI
- Gee J. G., 1996, Social Linguistics and Literacies. Ideology in Discourse
- Greenberg K. L., 1992, Writing Program Administration, 16, 7
- 10.1080/03075070600922709 · DOI · Paper page
- Harris A., 2013, Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 7, A62
- Harris A., 2011, Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 5, A73
- Hyland K., 2004, Disciplinary Discourses. Social Interactions in Academic Writing, 10.3998/mpub.6719 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562510500239091 · DOI
- Jacobs C., 2007, Journal of Education, 41, 59
- 10.2989/16073614.2010.545025 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15434311laq0202_2 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139196581 · DOI
- Knoch U., 2012, Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 1, 31
- 10.1016/j.system.2009.12.006 · DOI
- Krause K.-L., 2005, The First Year Experience in Australian Universities: Findings from a Decade of National Studies
- 10.1080/0307507042000287230 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075079812331380364 · DOI
- 10.1558/japl.v4i1.5 · DOI
- 10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030108 · DOI
- 10.1080/0309877X.2011.645461 · DOI
- Messick S., 1989, Educational Measurement, 13
- 10.1080/15434303.2010.484516 · DOI
- Murray N., 2011, Ergo, 2, 27
- 10.1080/03075079.2014.981150 · DOI
- 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u · DOI
- Ransom L., 2009, Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3, A13
- 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0261444813000190 · DOI
- Thies A., 2014, Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8, A43
- Weir C. J., 2005, Language Testing and Validation, 10.1057/9780230514577 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562510600874268 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075079.2010.525630 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly
ONeill, R., & Russell, A. (2019) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.3795 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, A.
- Affiliations
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Harris, Anne
- Venue
- Teaching in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-01-29
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 287-300
- ISSN
- 1356-2517 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1294
- OpenAlex
- W2271969167
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 40.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teaching in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Keywords
- English proficiency, writing skills, oral literacy, graduate competencies, curriculum integration, course design, English for academic purposes, university policy, Australian universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating written communication skills: working towards a whole of course approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13562517.2016.1138456
- The paper
- Harris, A. (2016). Integrating written communication skills: working towards a whole of course approach. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1138456