Enhancing graduate employability attributes and capabilities formation: A service-learning approach
Abstract
Graduates’ employment outcomes remain a critical factor for all stakeholders in the sector. Positive graduate outcomes enhance students’ aspirations for a university, accountability to the government for funding, and as a proxy for university quality and curriculum relevance. However, with high unemployment rate, graduates feel unprepared for the world of work, while employers perceive graduates as lacking core employability soft-skills. Academics on their part struggle to integrate employability skills in the curriculum. Furthermore, globalisation, diversity in society and workplace, call for graduates with social and humane values. Informed by the Capability Approach, we argue that community service-learning (CSL) has the potential to enhance graduate employability skills while fostering human capabilities. From the analysis of qualitative data, critical thinking, communication skills, and teamwork; and capability for affiliation and dimension of agency were identified. We conclude that CSL enhances graduate outcomes beyond the narrow premise of training graduates solely for employment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Service-learning cultivates students' self-awareness, personal values, and social responsibility, preparing them with essential skills for life beyond the classroom.
“In addition to enhancing academic learning in various disciplines, service-learning cultivates students' self-awareness, personal values, and social responsibility, preparing them with essential skills for life beyond the classroom.”
From Beyond the Classroom: Integrating the ORID Model for In-Depth Reflection and Assessment in Service-Learning (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kayan Fadlelmula, F., & Qadhi, S. M. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14090987 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…through community involvement and civic responsibility [5], which in turn contributes to the development of a broad range of soft skills including critical thinking, decision-making, and problem-solving [6], as well as interpersonal skills such as communication, team building, and leadership [7].”
Background
- Authors
- Mtawa, N., Fongwa, S., & Wilson-Strydom, M.
- Affiliations
- University of the Free State (ZA)
- Human Sciences Research Council (ZA)
- SARCHI Chair in Higher Education & Human Development (HEHD) Research Programme, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, Republic of South Africa
- Corresponding author
- Mtawa, Ntimi
- Venue
- Teaching in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-10-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 679-695
- ISSN
- 1356-2517 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1294
- OpenAlex
- W2978291705
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 14.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teaching in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- South African National Research Foundation (U86540)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
- Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Keywords
- graduate employability, service-learning, capability approach, employability skills, human capabilities, critical thinking, communication skills, teamwork, affiliation, agency, curriculum integration, graduate outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review