Cited by 127Social Policy and Reform StudiesSustainable Development and Environmental PolicyEconomic Theory and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Environmental Paradox of the Welfare State: The Dynamics of Sustainability

Open access
Bailey, Daniel·2015·New Political Economy

Abstract

Thus far, there has been a reluctance to instigate a dialogue and engage with the tensions between two literatures with significant insights for each other. The first is the literature on the fiscal sustainability of welfare states, which is invariably predicated upon future growth primarily to manage demographic changes. The second is the post-growth literature, which has enjoyed a renaissance in recent years due to an environmental critique of economic growth. Both literatures contain implications for the analysis of welfare state sustainability. The primary contribution of this paper will be to explore the intractability of the tensions between these discourses and the difficulty of mapping out a progressive policy direction in the twenty-first century which meets both our environmental and social sensibilities. It is claimed that in the post-industrial world the fiscal sustainability of welfare capitalism is dependent upon public expenditure financed indirectly an environmentally unsustainable growth dynamic, but that ironically any conflagration of public welfare programmes is likely to be counter-productive as the welfare state is able to promote de-carbonisation strategies and notions of the public good as well as promoting monetarily and ecologically efficient public welfare services.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13563467.2015.1079169

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Blyth M., 2013, Austerity: A History of a Dangerous Idea
  2. Boulding K., 1981, Evolutionary Economics
  3. Chung J., 2009, Journal of American Medical Association, 18, 1970, 10.1001/jama.2009.1610 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cowen T., 2011, The Great Stagnation: How America Ate All the Low-Hanging Fruit of Modern History, Got Sick, and Will (Eventually) Feel Better
  5. 10.1353/wp.2001.0008 · DOI
  6. Daly H., 1972, Toward a Steady State Economy
  7. Daly H., 1977, Steady State Economics
  8. Deacon B., 2007, Global Social Policy and Governance
  9. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.013 · DOI
  10. Esping-Andersen G., 2009, The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women's New Roles
  11. 10.1163/156913308X289050 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/17450140903484049 · DOI
  13. 10.1332/policypress/9781847428288.003.0003 · DOI
  14. 10.1017/S0047279412001018 · DOI
  15. Gough I., 2013, British Journal of Political Science, 1
  16. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0033 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579396.003.0048 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/0958928708094890 · DOI
  19. 10.1332/030557303322034956 · DOI
  20. Hay C., 2011, European Welfare Capitalism in Hard Times
  21. Jackson T., 2009, Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet, 10.4324/9781849774338 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2012.03.004 · DOI
  23. Krugman P., 2012, End this Depression Now!
  24. Latouche S., 2009, Farewell to Growth
  25. 10.1177/0958928708094890 · DOI
  26. Meadows D.H., 1972, The Limits to Growth
  27. Mishan E.J., 1967, The Costs of Economic Growth
  28. NEF, 2008, Co-production: A Manifesto for Growing the Core Economy
  29. NEF, 2010, 21 Hours: Why a Shorter Working Week Can Help Us All to Flourish in the 21st Century
  30. NEF, 2011, Growth Isn't Possible
  31. Nordensvärd J., 2013, Low Carbon Development: Key Issues, 66
  32. Offe C., 1976, International Journal of Politics, 6, 29
  33. 10.4159/9780674369542 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Simms A., 2013, Cancel the Apocalypse: The New Path to Prosperity
  35. Skidelsky R., 2012, How Much Is Enough? Money and the Good Life
  36. 10.1017/CBO9780511817434 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Sustainable Development Commission (SDC), 2008, NHS England Carbon Emissions: Carbon Footprinting Report
  38. 10.1057/9781137328113 · DOI
  39. Therborn G., 2014, The Killing Fields of Inequality
  40. 10.4337/9781848442993 · DOI
  41. 10.2307/3003300 · DOI
  42. 10.1086/210135 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Wilkinson R., 2009, The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bailey, D.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Bailey, Daniel
Venue
New Political Economy
Published
2015-09
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
793-811
ISSN
  • 1356-3467 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9923
OpenAlex
W1707819507
Cited by
127
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
34.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • New Political Economy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
Keywords
welfare state sustainability, fiscal sustainability, post-growth, welfare capitalism, government spending, demographic change, public goods, environmental policy, social policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review