Cited by 28Global Financial Regulation and CrisesFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceDigital Transformation in Financial Services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imaginary failure: RegTech in finance

Open access
Campbell-Verduyn, Malcolm, Lenglet, Marc·2023·New Political Economy

Abstract

The notion of ‘RegTech’ has become a buzzword for applications of emergent technologies to regulatory activities. This paper contextualises and interrogates the novelty of the RegTech phenomenon as expounded in recent years by industry practitioners, regulators and a growing chorus of scholars. Harnessing the notion of ‘imaginary’ from Science and Technology Studies, we identify a particular solutionist vision materialising across public documents from national and international financial regulators, industry organisations, as well as RegTech and consulting firms. We identify two failures of an emerging RegTech imaginary. First, is a dynamism failure in the way RegTech materialises static visions of regulation. Second, is a systems failure as the solutionist RegTech imaginary focuses on narrower, individual problems in finance at the expense of wider changes occurring since the 2007–8 global financial crisis. RegTech, we conclude, reflects continuities with a pre-crisis era and fails to tackle key market and regulatory changes occurring since. Our analysis holds implications for the turn to technological solutions in addressing persistent issues of instability in global financial governance. We point to the need for developing wider imaginaries of technological possibilities for regulation in an increasingly digital world.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13563467.2022.2140795

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Ahdieh R., 2011, Boston University Law Review, 91, 43
  2. Arachnys, 2020, AML alternative data. Detecting emerging risk
  3. Arner D.W., 2017, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 37, 371
  4. Ayache E., 2010, The blank swan: the end of probability
  5. 10.1080/13563467.2012.662952 · DOI
  6. Baker A., 2014, Transnational financial regulation after the crisis, 29
  7. 10.1080/09692290.2018.1459780 · DOI
  8. 10.1057/978-1-137-45443-0_20 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/09692290.2021.1888144 · DOI
  10. BFA Global, 2018, Financial authorities in the era of data abundance RegTech for regulators and SupTech solutions
  11. 10.7551/mitpress/12075.003.0002 · DOI
  12. BIS, 2018, Innovative technology in financial supervision (suptech) – The experience of early users
  13. BIS, 2019, The suptech generations
  14. 10.1017/9781009029841.010 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/13563467.2021.1910645 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/978-3-030-02330-0_6 · DOI
  17. 10.1057/s41265-017-0047-5 · DOI
  18. de Goede M., 2005, Virtue, fortune, and faith: a genealogy of finance
  19. 10.1108/13590790910993717 · DOI
  20. Deloitte, 2017, The evolving fintech regulatory environment. preparing for the inevitable
  21. Deloitte, 2020, Regtech universe 2020
  22. Eubanks V., 2017, Automating inequality: how high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor
  23. FCA, 2015, Supporting the development and adoption of RegTech
  24. 10.1080/13563460903553723 · DOI
  25. FSB, 2020, The Use of supervisory and regulatory technology by authorities and regulated institutions. Market developments and financial stability implications
  26. 10.1111/dech.12645 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1007/978-0-230-31419-1 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/09692290.2014.891242 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/1024529420965524 · DOI
  30. 10.14288/clogic.v17i0.191526 · DOI
  31. Haldane, A.G. 2012. Towards a common financial language. Speech given at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association ‘Building a Global Legal Entity Identifier Framework’ Symposium, New York. Available from: http://www.bis.org/review/r120315g.pdf.
  32. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662289.001.0001 · DOI
  33. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262162524.003.0005 · DOI
  34. IIF, 2016, Regtech in financial services: technology solutions for compliance and reporting
  35. 10.1080/13563467.2019.1708879 · DOI
  36. 10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.003.0001 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/0038026119899350 · DOI
  39. KPMG, 2017, KPMG frontiers in finance, 57, 14
  40. 10.1080/13563467.2018.1545754 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/13563467.2020.1766432 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s11245-019-09653-6 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/09692290.2014.957233 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/13563467.2021.1952556 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/09692290.2020.1743340 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/03085147.2014.881597 · DOI
  47. McNeil M., 2017, The handbook of science and technology studies, 435
  48. 10.1080/13563467.2017.1417368 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jebo.2005.03.015 · DOI
  50. Morozov E., 2013, To save everything, click here. The folly of technological solutionism
  51. 10.1177/0305829810364275 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/jfr/fjaa004 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/jcms.13097 · DOI
  54. Power M., 2004, The risk management of everything. rethinking the politics of uncertainty
  55. 10.1525/ae.2004.31.3.392 · DOI
  56. 10.1177/2053951718820549 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1177/0305829813511866 · DOI
  58. 10.1017/S0260210515000133 · DOI
  59. 10.1080/13563467.2022.2091534 · DOI
  60. 10.1080/09692290.2021.1935294 · DOI
  61. 10.1068/c10c · DOI
  62. Swartz L., 2017, Another economy is possible: culture and economy in a time of crisis, 82
  63. Tett G., 2009, Fool’s gold: how unrestrained greed corrupted a dream, shattered global markets and unleashed a catastrophe
  64. 10.1080/17530350.2011.609699 · DOI
  65. Tooze A., 2018, Crashed: how a decade of financial crises changed the world
  66. Underhill G., 2013, Global financial integration, twin crises, and the enduring search for financial stability
  67. 10.1016/j.aos.2012.08.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Campbell-Verduyn, M., & Lenglet, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of International Relations and International Organization, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • NEOMA Business School (FR)
Venue
New Political Economy
Published
2022-11-16
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
468-482
ISSN
  • 1356-3467 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9923
OpenAlex
W4309127685
Cited by
28
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Political Economy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Global Financial Regulation and Crises
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Financial Services
Keywords
regulatory technology, financial regulation, imaginary, solutionism, financial regulators, 2008 financial crisis, financial governance, digital regulation, financial stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review