The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imaginary failure: RegTech in finance
Open accessAbstract
The notion of ‘RegTech’ has become a buzzword for applications of emergent technologies to regulatory activities. This paper contextualises and interrogates the novelty of the RegTech phenomenon as expounded in recent years by industry practitioners, regulators and a growing chorus of scholars. Harnessing the notion of ‘imaginary’ from Science and Technology Studies, we identify a particular solutionist vision materialising across public documents from national and international financial regulators, industry organisations, as well as RegTech and consulting firms. We identify two failures of an emerging RegTech imaginary. First, is a dynamism failure in the way RegTech materialises static visions of regulation. Second, is a systems failure as the solutionist RegTech imaginary focuses on narrower, individual problems in finance at the expense of wider changes occurring since the 2007–8 global financial crisis. RegTech, we conclude, reflects continuities with a pre-crisis era and fails to tackle key market and regulatory changes occurring since. Our analysis holds implications for the turn to technological solutions in addressing persistent issues of instability in global financial governance. We point to the need for developing wider imaginaries of technological possibilities for regulation in an increasingly digital world.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Blockchain exempli fi es the inseparability of fi ntech infrastructure from the cultural imaginaries that propel it (de Goede 2021; Campbell-Verduyn and Lenglet, 2022).”
From Blockchain financialization, neo-colonialism, and Binance (2023) · cites this paper as Campbell-Verduyn and Lenglet, 2022
Citations
Cites
Systemic risk in banking ecosystems
Haldane, A. G., & May, R. M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09659 · Cited by 1,480
Ortiz, H. (2021) · Anthropological Theory · doi:10.1177/1463499620951374 · Cited by 37
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 67
- Ahdieh R., 2011, Boston University Law Review, 91, 43
- Arachnys, 2020, AML alternative data. Detecting emerging risk
- Arner D.W., 2017, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 37, 371
- Ayache E., 2010, The blank swan: the end of probability
- 10.1080/13563467.2012.662952 · DOI
- Baker A., 2014, Transnational financial regulation after the crisis, 29
- 10.1080/09692290.2018.1459780 · DOI
- 10.1057/978-1-137-45443-0_20 · DOI
- 10.1080/09692290.2021.1888144 · DOI
- BFA Global, 2018, Financial authorities in the era of data abundance RegTech for regulators and SupTech solutions
- 10.7551/mitpress/12075.003.0002 · DOI
- BIS, 2018, Innovative technology in financial supervision (suptech) – The experience of early users
- BIS, 2019, The suptech generations
- 10.1017/9781009029841.010 · DOI
- 10.1080/13563467.2021.1910645 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-02330-0_6 · DOI
- 10.1057/s41265-017-0047-5 · DOI
- de Goede M., 2005, Virtue, fortune, and faith: a genealogy of finance
- 10.1108/13590790910993717 · DOI
- Deloitte, 2017, The evolving fintech regulatory environment. preparing for the inevitable
- Deloitte, 2020, Regtech universe 2020
- Eubanks V., 2017, Automating inequality: how high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor
- FCA, 2015, Supporting the development and adoption of RegTech
- 10.1080/13563460903553723 · DOI
- FSB, 2020, The Use of supervisory and regulatory technology by authorities and regulated institutions. Market developments and financial stability implications
- 10.1111/dech.12645 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-0-230-31419-1 · DOI
- 10.1080/09692290.2014.891242 · DOI
- 10.1177/1024529420965524 · DOI
- 10.14288/clogic.v17i0.191526 · DOI
- Haldane, A.G. 2012. Towards a common financial language. Speech given at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association ‘Building a Global Legal Entity Identifier Framework’ Symposium, New York. Available from: http://www.bis.org/review/r120315g.pdf.
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662289.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262162524.003.0005 · DOI
- IIF, 2016, Regtech in financial services: technology solutions for compliance and reporting
- 10.1080/13563467.2019.1708879 · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.003.0001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4 · DOI
- 10.1177/0038026119899350 · DOI
- KPMG, 2017, KPMG frontiers in finance, 57, 14
- 10.1080/13563467.2018.1545754 · DOI
- 10.1080/13563467.2020.1766432 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11245-019-09653-6 · DOI
- 10.1080/09692290.2014.957233 · DOI
- 10.1080/13563467.2021.1952556 · DOI
- 10.1080/09692290.2020.1743340 · DOI
- 10.1080/03085147.2014.881597 · DOI
- McNeil M., 2017, The handbook of science and technology studies, 435
- 10.1080/13563467.2017.1417368 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jebo.2005.03.015 · DOI
- Morozov E., 2013, To save everything, click here. The folly of technological solutionism
- 10.1177/0305829810364275 · DOI
- 10.1093/jfr/fjaa004 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcms.13097 · DOI
- Power M., 2004, The risk management of everything. rethinking the politics of uncertainty
- 10.1525/ae.2004.31.3.392 · DOI
- 10.1177/2053951718820549 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0305829813511866 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0260210515000133 · DOI
- 10.1080/13563467.2022.2091534 · DOI
- 10.1080/09692290.2021.1935294 · DOI
- 10.1068/c10c · DOI
- Swartz L., 2017, Another economy is possible: culture and economy in a time of crisis, 82
- Tett G., 2009, Fool’s gold: how unrestrained greed corrupted a dream, shattered global markets and unleashed a catastrophe
- 10.1080/17530350.2011.609699 · DOI
- Tooze A., 2018, Crashed: how a decade of financial crises changed the world
- Underhill G., 2013, Global financial integration, twin crises, and the enduring search for financial stability
- 10.1016/j.aos.2012.08.001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blockchain financialization, neo-colonialism, and Binance
Jutel, O. (2023) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2023.1160257 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell-Verduyn, M., & Lenglet, M.
- Affiliations
- Department of International Relations and International Organization, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- NEOMA Business School (FR)
- Venue
- New Political Economy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-11-16
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 468-482
- ISSN
- 1356-3467 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9923
- OpenAlex
- W4309127685
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- New Political Economy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Global Financial Regulation and Crises
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Financial Services
- Keywords
- regulatory technology, financial regulation, imaginary, solutionism, financial regulators, 2008 financial crisis, financial governance, digital regulation, financial stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review