Development of a model of diversity, equity and inclusion for sport volunteers: an examination of the experiences of diverse volunteers for a national sport governing body
Abstract
This study explores the meaning of inclusion among Black, Brown and Indigenous Persons of Color (BIPOC) and LGBTQI+ volunteers of a national sport governing body. The study situates itself within socio-ecological and critical race theories to (a) examine the experience of inclusion (or lack thereof) for minoritized volunteers and (b) identify hindrances and enablers of inclusion. Volunteers perform essential roles within sport organizations, and increased diversity, equity, and inclusion is central for justice and performance reasons. However, limited research exists which critically examines the experience of volunteers from traditionally underrepresented populations. This study seeks to fill that gap. Improving diversity and inclusion within NGBs is not only likely to improve organizational performance, but also addresses issues of good governance and social justice. Semi-structured interviews coupled with narrative inquiry were employed to collect and analyze data. Findings suggest that volunteers experienced inclusion, or lack thereof, across four layered systems – personal, interpersonal, organizational and community. Within those layers, we identified the following subthemes: unique experience and viewpoint, personal responsibility, assimilation (individual); political/social capital, mentors (interpersonal); required commitment, inclusion not embedded in organizational cultural (organizational); implicit bias, microaggressions (community). From this model, we suggest c…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recreational organisations are more likely than many places of education and employment to recruit and retain a homogeneous pool of volunteers who may not be fluent in the language and debates surrounding inclusive policy.
“In comparison to many places of education and employmentwhere training in equality, diversity, and inclusivity is now legally required -recreational organisations are more likely 'to recruit and retain a homogenous pool of volunteers'(Legg & Karner 2021: 968) who may not be fluent in the language and debates surrounding inclusive policy.”
From ‘I don’t care who joins my choir’: Investigating attitudes to diversity and inclusivity in lower- and upper-voice choirs in the United Kingdom (2025) · cites this paper as Legg & Karner 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MacGregor, E. H., & Pitts, S. E. (2025) · International Journal of Community Music · doi:10.1386/ijcm_00119_1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Legg, E., & Karner, E.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Legg, Eric
- ORCID
- Legg, Eric
- Venue
- Sport, Education and Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-05-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 966-981
- ISSN
- 1357-3322 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1243
- OpenAlex
- W3159147892
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sport Education and Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Physical Education and Sports Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Keywords
- diversity, equity, and inclusion, sports volunteers, inclusion, underrepresented groups, socio-ecological model, critical race theory, microaggressions, implicit bias, mentoring, organizational culture, social justice in sport
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review