Cited by 29Children's Rights and ParticipationDisability Rights and RepresentationInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding Young Children’s Capabilities: Approaches to Interviews with Young Children Experiencing Disability

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of engaging young children with disabilities in interviews to elicit their perspectives on their own capabilities. Using the theoretical framework of the capability approach, the authors investigated the efficacy of different interview techniques to engage young children with disabilities in research about their capabilities. The study explores young disabled children’s perspectives of their capabilities (those skills and activities that they value), while examining the effectiveness of interviewing children who have delays in development, linguistic, behavioural and social characteristics. Through analysis of four children’s descriptions and demonstrations of their capabilities, both the responses and the interview techniques are analysed. Including young children in research is a relatively recent approach, but this study suggests that young children with disabilities are able to communicate their capabilities and that participatory methods are effective in eliciting their views. As such, eliciting the unique perspectives of young children with disabilities about their capability will enhance our understanding for the purpose of designing early childhood programmes and adequately responding to all children’s needs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13575279.2015.1037249

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1353/hcr.2006.0000 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00407.x · DOI
  3. Bernard H. R., 2010, Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches
  4. Biggeri M., 2007, Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education, pp. 197, 10.1057/9780230604810_10 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/14649880500501179 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/193758671400700205 · DOI
  7. Clark A., 2005, Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early childhood services, 29, 10.2307/j.ctt1t89j0f.8 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/1468794111400532 · DOI
  9. Clark, C. D. (2011).In a younger voice: Doing child-centered qualitative research. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. 10.1080/09687590601056162 · DOI
  11. 10.1057/9781137008220 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/1476718X09336971 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/03004430802666999 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/13676261.2013.815698 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/14733280801963045 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2010.00295.x · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00213.x · DOI
  18. 10.1177/1476718X09336969 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/1468798410383251 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/1049732304273862 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/13645570600655159 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/09518398.2014.916434 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0907568207068561 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/1744987112475249 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/1049732306293846 · DOI
  26. Mandell N., 1991, Studying the social worlds of children: Sociological readings
  27. McLeod A., 2008, Listening to children: A practitioner’s guide
  28. 10.1177/1473325004048025 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/10442073060160040501 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/0907568202009003005 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1080/08856250903450806 · DOI
  32. Sen A., 1999, Development as freedom
  33. 10.3138/cmlr.64.4.581 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.apnr.2010.02.005 · DOI
  35. Terzi L., 2008, Justice and equality in education: A capability perspective on disability and special educational needs
  36. United Nations., 1989, United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC)
  37. Underwood K., 2008, The construction of disability in schools: Teacher and Parent perspectives on the experience of labelled students, 10.1163/9789087902223 · DOI
  38. Underwood, K., Valeo, A. & Wood, R. (2012). Understanding inclusive early childhood education: A capability approach.Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood,13(4), 290–299. · DOI
  39. 10.1057/9780230604810 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2012.00432.x · DOI
  41. Wright S., 2007, Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 32, 37, 10.1177/183693910703200408 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Underwood, K., Chan, C., Koller, D., & Valeo, A.
Corresponding author
Underwood, Kathryn
Venue
Child Care in Practice
Published
2015-05-21
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
220-237
ISSN
  • 1357-5279 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-489X
OpenAlex
W1608882703
Cited by
29
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Child Care in Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
young children with disabilities, children's abilities, capability approach, children's perspectives, children's interviews, participatory research, interview techniques, developmental delay, behavioral characteristics, social characteristics, early childhood programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review