The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The divided visual field paradigm: Methodological considerations
Abstract
The divided visual field methodology has been used to examine a wide variety of lateralised processes. When conducting such studies it is important to employ a number of strict controls in order to maximise the effectiveness of the paradigm for examining the processing of stimuli by each hemisphere. The use of these controls is discussed in this paper. The following issues are discussed: selection of participants; methods of fixation control; presenting stimuli unilaterally; methods of responding; and measures that can be taken. The use of the divided visual field paradigm to examine interhemispheric cooperation is also discussed. Employing the recommended controls provides an effective and relatively easy method of examining the role of each hemisphere in the processing of stimuli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01520-5 · Cited by 684
Cited by
Brain Lateralization: A Comparative Perspective
Güntürkün, O., Ströckens, F., & Ocklenburg, S. (2020) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00006.2019 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourne, V. J.
- Venue
- Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 373-393
- ISSN
- 1357-650X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0678
- OpenAlex
- W2125853540
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The divided visual field paradigm: Methodological considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13576500600633982
- The paper
- Bourne, V. J. (2006). The divided visual field paradigm: Methodological considerations. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500600633982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
