The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence of bullying and harassment at work, to identify risk groups and risk organizations, and to investigate who the victims report to be their tormentors. Bullying and harassment are defined as situations where a worker or a supervisor is systematically mistreated and victimized by fellow workers or supervisors through repeated negative acts. However, to be a victim of such bullying one must also feel inferiority in defending oneself in the actual situation. Data from 14 different Norwegian surveys (N = 7986) are presented, encompassing a broad array of organizations and professions. The results show that bullying and harassment at work are widespread problems in Norwegian working life. As many as 8.6% of the respondents had been bullied at work during the previous six months. Organizations with many employees, male-dominated organizations, and industrial organizations had the highest prevalence of victimization. Older workers had a higher risk of victimization than younger workers. Even if men and women do not differ in prevalence of bullying, significantly more men were reported as bullies. Victims reported superiors as bullies as often as they reported colleagues as their tormentor(s).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact.
Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//1076-8998.6.1.64 · Cited by 2,084
Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678370902815673 · Cited by 1,598
Self-citationWorkplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: a theoretical model and meta-analysis.
Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998 · Cited by 1,320
Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work.
Zapf, D. (1999) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/01437729910268669 · Cited by 790
Workplace Victimization: Aggression from the Target's Perspective
Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163703 · Cited by 731
Metadata
- Authors
- Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-201
- ISSN
- 1359-432X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0643
- OpenAlex
- W2025736251
- Cited by
- 999
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13594329608414854
- The paper
- Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.