The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes
Abstract
This article analyses the relationship between mobbing, job characteristics, social environment variables, and psychological ill-health. The Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization (LIFT) was factor analysed and led to seven factors in two samples of mobbing victims (N = 50 and N = 99): Mobbing by organizational measures, social isolation, attacking the victim's private life, attacking the victim's attitudes, physical violence, verbal aggression, and rumours. Mobbing was correlated with bad job content, a bad social environment, and psychological ill-health. The findings suggest that the more social support supervisors gave, the less the victims reported being shouted at, being constantly criticized, and receiving verbal threats. In contrast, the more social support the victims received from their colleagues the less they reported being socially isolated or being ridiculed with regard to their private life. Moreover, having private life attacked showed the strongest correlation with psychological ill-health. The data suggest that organizational factors are potential causes of mobbing at work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
Zapf, D., Dormann, C., & Frese, M. (1996) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.2.145 · Cited by 1,174
Self-citation
Cited by
Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: a theoretical model and meta-analysis.
Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998 · Cited by 1,320
Hershcovis, M. S. (2011) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.689 · Cited by 893
Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work.
Zapf, D. (1999) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/01437729910268669 · Cited by 790
Self-citationWorkplace Victimization: Aggression from the Target's Perspective
Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163703 · Cited by 731
Vartia, M. A.-L. (2001) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.588 · Cited by 607
Metadata
- Authors
- Zapf, D., Knorz, C., & Kulla, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-237
- ISSN
- 1359-432X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0643
- OpenAlex
- W2061865502
- Cited by
- 776
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13594329608414856
- The paper
- Zapf, D., Knorz, C., & Kulla, M. (1996). On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414856
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.