Cited by 67Teacher Education and AssessmentsTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEvaluation of Teaching Practices

The pursuit of teacher quality: identifying some of the multiple discourses of quality that impact the work of teacher educators

Churchward, Peter, Willis, Jill·2019·Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education

Abstract

Concerns with the readiness of beginning teachers has resulted in significant changes to ITE programs in Australia. Declining student performance in domestic and international assessments is being seen as a policy problem that can be addressed through policy solutions intended to lift the quality of teachers. While quality and performance measures are linked in this policy agenda, it is not clear how quality teacher and teaching are being defined. In this special issue exploring what teacher educators “should” know, it is reasonable for teacher educators to know more about the ideals of teacher and teaching quality against which they are held to account. Exploring the literature pertaining to the quality teacher discourse informing initial teacher education (ITE) programs, this paper is a thematic literature review relating to the discourses of teacher and teaching quality. Understanding how these discourses of quality interrelate and shape teacher education is an important and necessary consideration in the development of ITE programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1359866x.2018.1555792

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A key aim of these reforms has been to increase regulatory control over the ITE sector through centralised curricular and a focus on 'accountability' and 'professional standards'.

    “A key aim of these reforms has been to increase regulatory control over the ITE sector through centralised curricular and a focus on 'accountability' and 'professional standards' (Alexander & Bourke, 2021;Churchward & Willis, 2019;Mutton et al., 2017) which are consistent with policy reforms beyond England.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Churchward, P., & Willis, J.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Churchward, Peter
Venue
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Published
2018-12-12
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
251-264
ISSN
  • 1359-866X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2945
OpenAlex
W2904201945
Cited by
67
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
18.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
teacher quality, teaching quality, initial teacher education, novice teachers, teacher education policy, teacher education quality assurance, student performance, teacher educators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review