CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 146Higher Education and EmployabilityDoctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsDisability Education and Employment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategic institutional approaches to graduate employability: navigating meanings, measurements and what really matters

Open access
Bridgstock, Ruth, Jackson, Denise·2019·Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
DOI 10.1080/1360080x.2019.1646378
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Despite ongoing efforts by universities, challenges and tensions continue to exist in academic discourse, policy and practice around graduate employability. These factors can militate against the sector’s capacity to prepare learners for life and work, because they promote unclear, and sometimes counterproductive and competing, courses of action. This article suggests that higher education institutions’ approaches to graduate employability reflect at least three aims. The aims relate to: (i) short-term graduate outcomes; (ii) professional readiness; and (iii) living and working productively and meaningfully across the lifespan. The commitment to each of these aims is often tacit and ill-defined and varies within as well as between institutions, and over time. This article attempts to navigate a productive path through the multiple aims and agendas, along with the definitional and measurement challenges, to identify, workable approaches. It suggests some actionable principles to enhance employability that address the tensions between the three employability aims.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1360080x.2019.1646378

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bridgstock, R., Grant-Iramu, M., Bilsland, C., Tofa, M., Lloyd, K., & Jackson, D. (in press). Going beyond ‘getting a job’: Graduates’ narratives and lived experiences of employability and their career development. In J. Higgs, W. Letts, & G. Crisp (Eds.), Education for employability II: Learning for future possibilities. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense-Brill.
  2. Committee for Economic Development of Australia. (2015). Australia’s future workforce? Melbourne, Australia: CEDA.
  3. Davies, A., Fidler, D., & Gorbis, M. (2011). Future work skills 2020. Phoenix: Institute for the Future for University of Phoenix Research Institute.
  4. EY. (2018). Can the universities of today lead learning for tomorrow. Sydney, Australia: Author.
  5. Foundation for Young Australians. (2018). The new work reality. Melbourne, Australia: FYA.
  6. Gilworth B. & Cobb F. (2017). Where are you right now? Using careers registration to support employability in higher education. Paper presented at the HEA Surveys Conference Manchester.
  7. Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2018). Graduate Outcomes survey questions. Cheltenham, UK: HESA.
  8. 10.1111/ijtd.2017.21.issue-3 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/joec.2011.48.issue-4 · DOI
  10. Social Research Centre. (2019a). 2018 graduate outcomes survey. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
  11. World Economic Forum. (2018). The future of jobs report. Geneva: Author.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–146 of 146

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bridgstock, R., & Jackson, D.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Jackson, Denise
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-07-25
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
468-484
ISSN
  • 1360-080X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9508
DOI
10.1080/1360080x.2019.1646378
OpenAlex
W2947482696
Cited by
146
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10
FWCI
31.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Education › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
graduate employability, higher education institutions, professional readiness, graduate outcomes, lifelong employability, employability policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review