Agency and empowerment: a proposal for internationally comparable indicators
Abstract
This article proposes a short list of internationally comparable indicators of individual agency and empowerment (and the corresponding survey questions). Data from these indicators would enable researchers to explore research and policy issues such as the interconnections between empowerment and economic or human development. The paper surveys definitions of agency and empowerment and adopts the definition from Amartya Sen, supplemented by Rowlands' typology. The proposed “shortlist” of indicators includes: control over personal decisions; domain-specific autonomy; household decision-making; and the ability to change aspects in one's life at the individual and communal levels. The strengths and weaknesses of each indicator are discussed, as is the need to supplement this shortlist with other variables. To ensure the feasibility of the proposal, we rely on previously fielded questions wherever possible.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Without a goal or a definition of participation, it is difficult to evaluate whether empowerment happened or the process was successful.
“Though there are multiple attempts to measure the effects of participation, without a goal or a definition of participation, it is difficult to evaluate whether empowerment happened or the process was successful”
From An introduction to radical participatory design: decolonising participatory design processes (2022) · cites this paper as Ibrahim & Alkire 2007
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 87 · Cited by 644
- Authors
- IBRAHIM, S., & ALKIRE, S.
- Venue
- Oxford Development Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-11-29
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 379-403
- ISSN
- 0264-5491 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0818
- 1469-9966
- OpenAlex
- W3126082266
- Cited by
- 644
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 23.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford Development Studies (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
- Keywords
- individual agency, empowerment, empowerment indicators, household decision-making, Amartya Sen, human development, economic development, survey questions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review