Cited by 644Income, Poverty, and InequalityGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsGender, Education, and Development Issues

Agency and empowerment: a proposal for internationally comparable indicators

IBRAHIM, SOLAVA, ALKIRE, SABINA·2007·Oxford Development Studies

Abstract

This article proposes a short list of internationally comparable indicators of individual agency and empowerment (and the corresponding survey questions). Data from these indicators would enable researchers to explore research and policy issues such as the interconnections between empowerment and economic or human development. The paper surveys definitions of agency and empowerment and adopts the definition from Amartya Sen, supplemented by Rowlands' typology. The proposed “shortlist” of indicators includes: control over personal decisions; domain-specific autonomy; household decision-making; and the ability to change aspects in one's life at the individual and communal levels. The strengths and weaknesses of each indicator are discussed, as is the need to supplement this shortlist with other variables. To ensure the feasibility of the proposal, we rely on previously fielded questions wherever possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13600810701701897

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Without a goal or a definition of participation, it is difficult to evaluate whether empowerment happened or the process was successful.

    “Though there are multiple attempts to measure the effects of participation, without a goal or a definition of participation, it is difficult to evaluate whether empowerment happened or the process was successful”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 87 · Cited by 644

Authors
IBRAHIM, S., & ALKIRE, S.
Venue
Oxford Development Studies
Published
2007-11-29
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
379-403
ISSN
  • 0264-5491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0818
  • 1469-9966
OpenAlex
W3126082266
Cited by
644
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 20
FWCI
23.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford Development Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
Keywords
individual agency, empowerment, empowerment indicators, household decision-making, Amartya Sen, human development, economic development, survey questions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review