Cited by 564Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsDecolonial Thought and EpistemologiesIndigenous and Place-Based Education

Rethinking the role of Indigenous knowledges in the academy

Dei, George J. Sefa·2000·International Journal of Inclusive Education

Abstract

This paper is an invitation critically to engage in the discussion of ‘Indigenous knowledges’ and the implication for academic decolonization. Among the issues raised are questions of the definition and operationalization of Indigenous knowledges and the challenges of pursuing such knowledge in the Western academy. The paper draws attention to some of the nuances, contradictions and contestations in affirming the place of Indigenous knowledges in the academy. It is pointed out that Indigenous knowledges do not ‘sit in pristine fashion’ outside of the effects of other knowledges. In particular, the paper brings new and complex readings to the term ‘Indigenous’, maintaining that different bodies of knowledge continually influence each other to show the dynamism of all knowledge systems. It is argued that when located in the Euro-American educational contexts, Indigenous knowledges can be fundamentally experientially based, non-universal, holistic and relational knowledges of ‘resistance’. In the discussion, the paper interrogates the notions of tradition, authenticity, orality and the assertion of Indigenous identity as crucial to the educational and political project of affirming Indigenous knowledges.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/136031100284849

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Commonalities exist among various Indigenous communities in their understanding of an interconnected and holistic worldview; relational ontology, epistemology, and accountability; and a commitment to decolonization.

    “Other scholars echo this teaching and assert that commonalities exist among various Indigenous communities in their understanding of an interconnected and a holistic worldview; relational ontology, epistemology, and accountability; and a commitment to decolonization (Dei, 2000; Henderson, 2000; Strang, 1997).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dei, G. J. S.
Corresponding author
Dei, George J. Sefa
Venue
International Journal of Inclusive Education
Published
2000-04
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
111-132
ISSN
  • 1360-3116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5173
OpenAlex
W2010612234
Cited by
564
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 21
FWCI
8.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Inclusive Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
Keywords
indigenous knowledge, Western academy, indigenous identity, relational knowledge, orality, knowledge systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review