Cited by 126Higher Education Research StudiesSocial and Cultural DynamicsHigher Education Practises and Engagement

‘Low income doesn't mean stupid and destined for failure': challenging the deficit discourse around students from low SES backgrounds in higher education

McKay, Jade, Devlin, Marcia·2016·International Journal of Inclusive Education

Abstract

The discourse around students from low socio-economic backgrounds often adopts a deficit conception in which these students are seen as a ‘problem’ in higher education. In light of recent figures pointing to an increase in the number and proportion of these students participating in higher education [Pitman, T. 2014. “More Students in Higher ed, But it's no more Representative.” The Conversation 28: 1–4] and an absence of evidence to support deficit thinking, this deficit discourse requires re-examination. Qualitative data from 115 interviews carried out across 6 Australian universities as part of a national study reveal that, contrary to the conception of these students as a ‘problem’, students from low SES backgrounds demonstrate high levels of determination and academic skills and that they actively seek high standards in their studies. This paper critically examines deficit conceptions of these students, drawing on findings from qualitative interviews with 89 successful students from low SES backgrounds and 26 staff members recognised as exemplary in their provision of teaching and support of students from low SES backgrounds. Drawing on these findings, this paper challenges the deficit discourse and argues for a more affirmative and nuanced conception of students from low SES backgrounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13603116.2015.1079273

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 49 · Cited by 126

Authors
McKay, J., & Devlin, M.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Federation University (AU)
Corresponding author
McKay, Jade
Venue
International Journal of Inclusive Education
Published
2015-09-18
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
347-363
ISSN
  • 1360-3116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5173
OpenAlex
W1949328769
Cited by
126
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
24.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Inclusive Education (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
Office for Learning and Teaching
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
low socioeconomic status, deficit discourse, higher education, student success, academic skills, student support staff

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review