Cited by 51Reading and Literacy DevelopmentInclusive Education and DiversityInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Fractured academic identities: dyslexia, secondary education, self-esteem and school experiences

Open access
Lithari, Eleni·2019·International Journal of Inclusive Education

Abstract

Identity construction for individuals with dyslexia is significantly moulded by their transition to and experiences within secondary education. This is an interview-based study with 20 participants living in England. Support-related school experiences, relationships with teachers, societal perceptions about the importance of literacy and academic achievement and the reactions of others around them are the core focus. The findings are theorised using symbolic interactionism, and this paper aims to extend Goffman’s notion of ‘spoiled identity’ into a more specialised term for children with Special Educational Needs, resulting in the alternative term ‘fractured academic identity’, the elements of which are developed throughout this paper from the experiences of learners with dyslexia. The findings revolve around identity development as result of academic experiences, and are mainly aimed at teachers, to inform their knowledge around identity issues and to also inform their practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13603116.2018.1433242

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurodivergent students often come to university with a negative schema of education following their experiences at school.

    “Second, neurodivergent students often come to university with a negative schema of education following their experiences at school (Lithari, 2019; Mesa and Hamilton, 2022a,b).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

18 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lithari, E.
Affiliations
Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Corresponding author
Lithari, Eleni
Venue
International Journal of Inclusive Education
Published
2018-02-03
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
280-296
ISSN
  • 1360-3116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5173
OpenAlex
W2790810082
Cited by
51
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • International Journal of Inclusive Education (publishedVersion)
  • Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
dyslexia, secondary education, self-esteem, school experience, special educational needs, teacher-student relationship, literacy, academic performance, symbolic interactionism, Erving Goffman, spoiled identity, inclusive education, teacher practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review