Physical health and mental disorder in elderly suicide: A case-control study
Abstract
The psychological autopsy method was used to study 95 cases of suicide. Ninety-five comparison subjects matched for gender, age, region, and date of death were selected from the death register. This study showed that suicide cases did not differ from controls with regard to the number of chronic health problems and, compared to the suicide cases, the controls had less functional autonomy six months prior to death. If minor and sub-threshold depression cases were included, 74.7% of the suicide cases would have been considered as having a mental health disorder compared to 12.6% in the control group. When the effect of other co-variables were controlled for, multivariate analysis showed that suicide cases and controls did not differ according to marital status, education, income, and living arrangement. Furthermore, suicide cases were no more likely than controls to seldom meet with family members or friends or to have been isolated during the six-month period preceding their death. Our findings suggest that detection of psychiatric disorders, mainly depression, must be included in late life suicide prevention strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A Canadian study (60+) that examined contacts during the last six months showed no difference between suicide decedents and control subjects.
“An additional case-control New Zealand study with a lower inclusion age (55+) [56] also documented an association between low social contact and suicide, but a Canadian study (60+) that examined contacts during the last six months showed no difference between suicide decedents and control subjects [57].”
From A systematic review of social factors and suicidal behavior in older adulthood (2012) · cites this paper as [57]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- Préville, M., Hébert, R., Boyer, R., Bravo, G., & Seguin, M.
- Affiliations
- Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
- Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Préville, Michel
- ORCID
- Bravo, Gina
- Venue
- Aging & Mental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 576-584
- ISSN
- 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-6915
- OpenAlex
- W2047727554
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Keywords
- elderly suicide, late-life suicide, depression, subthreshold depression, functional autonomy, social isolation, suicide prevention, psychological autopsy, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Autopsy, Mental Disorders, Cause of Death, Family Relations, Female, Health Status, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Quebec, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Suicide, Geriatric Assessment, Comorbidity, Case-Control Studies, Proxy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review