The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Is exercise effective in promoting mental well-being in older age? A systematic review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Promoting the mental well-being of older people has been neglected. AIM: To examine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of exercise and physical activity interventions on mental well-being in people aged 65+. DESIGN: Systematic review, meta-analysis, economic model. METHODS: Reports published in English, identified by searching 25 databases, 11 websites and references lists of systematic reviews. Eligible studies were those with a comparison or control group or offering qualitative evidence; exercise and physical activity interventions for people aged 65 and above living at home, in the community, in supported housing or in residential care homes; including outcome measures of mental well-being, not simply measures of depression or anxiety. Low-quality studies were excluded from the data synthesis. RESULTS: An overall effect of exercise on mental well-being was found (standardised effect size = 0.27; CI = 0.14-0.40). The included interventions were designed for older people, targeted those who are sedentary and delivered in a community setting, primarily through a group-based approach led by trained leaders. As a minimum, the evidence would suggest two exercise sessions per week, each of 45 min duration. There is some indication that exercise can also improve the mental well-being of frail elders. Economic evidence indicated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (compared with minimal intervention) of pound 7300 and pound 12,100 per quality adjusted life year gained for community-based walking and exercise programmes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mental well-being in later life is modifiable through exercise and physical activity. To generalise the findings, there is a need for more evidence of effectiveness from older people in the UK.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mandolesi, L., Polverino, A., Montuori, S., Foti, F., Ferraioli, G., Sorrentino, P., & Sorrentino, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00509 · Cited by 1,038
de Vries, N. M., van Ravensberg, C. D., Hobbelen, J. S. M., Olde Rikkert, M. G. M., Staal, J. B., & Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G. (2012) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2011.11.002 · Cited by 396
Community gardening: Stress, well-being, and resilience potentials
Koay, W. I., & Dillon, D. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17186740 · Cited by 132
Rooney, C., McKinley, M. C., & Woodside, J. V. (2013) · Proceedings of The Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665113003388 · Cited by 130
Chinese older adults’ resilience to the loneliness of living alone: A qualitative study
Lou, V. W. Q., & Ng, J. W. (2012) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2012.692764 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Windle, G., Hughes, D., Linck, P., Russell, I., & Woods, B.
- Venue
- Aging & Mental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 652-669
- ISSN
- 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-6915
- OpenAlex
- W2060551691
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is exercise effective in promoting mental well-being in older age? A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13607861003713232
- The paper
- Windle, G., Hughes, D., Linck, P., Russell, I., & Woods, B. (2010). Is exercise effective in promoting mental well-being in older age? A systematic review. Aging & Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607861003713232
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.