No country for old men? The role of a ‘Gentlemen's Club’ in promoting social engagement and psychological well-being in residential care
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Social isolation is a common problem in older people who move into care that has negative consequences for well-being. This is of particular concern for men, who are marginalised in long-term care settings as a result of their reduced numbers and greater difficulty in accessing effective social support, relative to women. However, researchers in the social identity tradition argue that developing social group memberships can counteract the effects of isolation. We test this account in this study by examining whether increased socialisation with others of the same gender enhances social identification, well-being (e.g. life satisfaction, mood), and cognitive ability. METHOD: Care home residents were invited to join gender-based groups (i.e. Ladies and Gentlemen's Clubs). Nine groups were examined (five male groups, four female groups) comprising 26 participants (12 male, 14 female), who took part in fortnightly social activities. Social identification, personal identity strength, cognitive ability and well-being were measured at the commencement of the intervention and 12 weeks later. RESULTS: A clear gender effect was found. For women, there was evidence of maintained well-being and identification over time. For men, there was a significant reduction in depression and anxiety, and an increased sense of social identification with others. CONCLUSION: While decreasing well-being tends to be the norm in long-term residential care, building new social group memberships in the form of gender clubs can counteract this decline, particularly among men.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A club targeting men in a care home reported a significant reduction in depression and anxiety levels.
“Different results were found for a club targeting men in a care home, as participants reported a significant reduction in their depression and anxiety levels (Gleibs et al. 2011).”
From Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review (2017) · cites this paper as Gleibs et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 140
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Berkman, L.F., & Glass, T. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In L.F. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford.
- Clare, L. (2002). Assessment and intervention in dementia of the Alzheimer Type. In A.D. Baddeley, M.D. Kopelman, & B. A. Wilso (Eds.), Handbook of memory disorders (pp. 711-739). Chichester: Wiley.
- Durkheim, E. (1897/2007). On suicide. London: Penguin.
- Koff , T.H. (1997). The institutionalization of elderly men. In J.I. Kosberg & L.W. Kaye (Eds). Elderly Men (pp 279-293). New York: Springer.
- Underwood, P. W. (2000). Social support: The promise and reality. In B. H. Rice (Ed.) Handbook of stress, coping and health (pp. 367-391). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Authors
- Gleibs, I. H., Haslam, C., Jones, J. M., Alexander Haslam, S., McNeill, J., & Connolly, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- b School of Psychology, University of Exeter , Exeter , UK
- c Cornwall Care , Truro , UK
- Corresponding author
- Gleibs, Ilka H.
- Venue
- Aging & Mental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-04-14
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 456-466
- ISSN
- 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-6915
- OpenAlex
- W1989872734
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 13.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- orcid.org
- Locations
- Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-062-23-, Res–062–23–0135)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Keywords
- social isolation, older men, residential care, care homes, gentlemen's clubs, social identification, social group membership, psychological well-being, life satisfaction, depression, anxiety, cognitive ability, social engagement, gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Cognition, Depression, Female, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Social Identification, Social Isolation, Social Support, Geriatric Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review