The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic review of non-pharmacologic interventions to delay functional decline in community-dwelling patients with dementia
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Older adults with dementia experience progressive functional decline, which contributes to caregiver burden and nursing home placement. The goal of this systematic review was to determine if any non-pharmacologic interventions have delayed functional decline among community-dwelling dementia patients. METHOD: We completed a systematic literature review to identify controlled clinical trials reporting the impact of non-pharmacologic interventions on any measure of functional impairment or disability among community-dwelling dementia patients. We included studies that reported any proxy-respondent, self-reported, or performance-based standardized assessments. RESULTS: We identified 18 published clinical trials that met inclusion criteria and found that study interventions fell into three different groups: occupational therapy, exercise, and multi-faceted ("other") interventions. The three groups of studies tended to vary systematically regarding the conceptual framework for the disabling process, target of intervention, and type of outcome measure. Approximately half the studies were conducted in the United States with mean sample size of 99 (from 27 to 1131) and follow-up periods between three months and two years. Instruments used to measure functional impairment or disability varied widely with 55 instruments across 18 studies. Nine studies reported a statistically significant improvement in functional decline in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: The current literature provides clinical trial evidence that non-pharmacologic interventions can delay progression of functional impairment or disability among community-dwelling dementia patients. The clinical significance of this early evidence is uncertain. These early studies provide rationale for larger and longer-term studies to determine if these interventions are sufficiently potent to delay institutionalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“No effect has been documented for acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.”
From The Multidisciplinary Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia. A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [105]
In the citing paper
“A review including seven RCTs showed that OT interventions may maintain physical function and ADL in community-dwelling persons with dementia (105, 122).”
From The Multidisciplinary Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia. A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [105]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Cognitive Stimulation in Patients with Dementia: Randomized Controlled Trial
Mapelli, D., Rosa, E. D., Nocita, R., & Sava, D. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353457 · Cited by 3,477
Verbrugge, L. M., & Jette, A. M. (1994) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90294-1 · Cited by 3,310
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Montori, V., Akl, E. A., Djulbegovic, B., & Falck-Ytter, Y. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017 · Cited by 2,798
Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults.
Perera, S., Mody, S. H., Woodman, R. C., & Studenski, S. A. (2006) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00701.x · Cited by 2,513
Prevalence of Dementia in the United States: The Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study
Plassman, B. L., Langa, K. M., Fisher, G. G., Heeringa, S. G., Weir, D. R., Ofstedal, M. B., Burke, J. R., Hurd, M. D., Potter, G. G., Rodgers, W. L., et al. (2007) · Neuroepidemiology · doi:10.1159/000109998 · Cited by 1,932
Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? A meta-analysis
Vitaliano, P. P., Zhang, J., & Scanlan, J. M. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.946 · Cited by 1,734
Schneider, L. S., Dagerman, K. S., & Insel, P. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.15.1934 · Cited by 1,671
Effectiveness of Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease
Schneider, L. S., Tariot, P. N., Dagerman, K. S., Davis, S. M., Hsiao, J. K., Ismail, M. S., Lebowitz, B. D., Lyketsos, C. G., Ryan, J. M., Stroup, T. S., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061240 · Cited by 1,206
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–103 of 103
(2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-3-437-21884-2.00033-7
Kilimann, I., & Teipel, S. J. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-3-437-21884-2.00014-3
Hwang, J. J., Donnelly, T. T., Davidson, S., & Bouchal, S. R. (2026) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/10497323261468186
Metadata
- Authors
- McLaren, A. N., LaMantia, M. A., & Callahan, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
- Regenstrief Institute (US)
- Venue
- Aging & Mental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-04-23
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 655-666
- ISSN
- 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-6915
- PMC
- PMC3723698
- OpenAlex
- W2039890884
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (K24AG024078, R01AG034946)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Keywords
- dementia, functional decline, non-pharmacological treatment, community-dwelling older adults, occupational therapy, exercise intervention, multicomponent intervention, functional disability, disability, nursing home admission, caregiver burden
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Residence Characteristics, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
